OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential tension between the need for managers to produce measurable change and the skills required to produce cultural change, and to investigate how managers of primary care trusts are attempting to deal with this tension. DESIGN: Qualitative case studies using data derived from semistructured interviews and a review of published documents. An established cultural framework was to used to help interpret the findings. SETTING: Six primary care trusts in England purposefully sampled to represent a range of cultural, structural, geographical, and demographic characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: 42 interviews with 39 different senior and middle primary care trust managers conducted over an 18 month period. RESULTS: We found two distinct and polarised styles of management. One group of managers adopts a directive style and challenges the prevailing norms and values of clinicians, an approach characteristically seen in organisations with hierarchical cultures. This group is made up mostly of senior managers who are driven principally by the imperative to deliver a political agenda. Managers in the second group are more inclined to work with the prevailing cultures found in general practice, attempting to facilitate change from within rather than forcing change from outside. This management style is characteristically seen in organisations with a clan-type culture. The approach was manifest mostly by middle managers, who seem to act as buffers between the demands of senior managers and their own perception of the ability and willingness of health professionals to cope with change. The different management approaches can lead to tension and dysfunction between tiers of management. CONCLUSIONS: The development of primary care depends on high quality managers who are able to draw on a range of different management skills and styles. Managers are most likely to be effective if they appreciate the merits and drawbacks of their different styles and are willing to work in partnership.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential tension between the need for managers to produce measurable change and the skills required to produce cultural change, and to investigate how managers of primary care trusts are attempting to deal with this tension. DESIGN: Qualitative case studies using data derived from semistructured interviews and a review of published documents. An established cultural framework was to used to help interpret the findings. SETTING: Six primary care trusts in England purposefully sampled to represent a range of cultural, structural, geographical, and demographic characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: 42 interviews with 39 different senior and middle primary care trust managers conducted over an 18 month period. RESULTS: We found two distinct and polarised styles of management. One group of managers adopts a directive style and challenges the prevailing norms and values of clinicians, an approach characteristically seen in organisations with hierarchical cultures. This group is made up mostly of senior managers who are driven principally by the imperative to deliver a political agenda. Managers in the second group are more inclined to work with the prevailing cultures found in general practice, attempting to facilitate change from within rather than forcing change from outside. This management style is characteristically seen in organisations with a clan-type culture. The approach was manifest mostly by middle managers, who seem to act as buffers between the demands of senior managers and their own perception of the ability and willingness of health professionals to cope with change. The different management approaches can lead to tension and dysfunction between tiers of management. CONCLUSIONS: The development of primary care depends on high quality managers who are able to draw on a range of different management skills and styles. Managers are most likely to be effective if they appreciate the merits and drawbacks of their different styles and are willing to work in partnership.
Authors: S M Shortell; R H Jones; A W Rademaker; R R Gillies; D S Dranove; E F Hughes; P P Budetti; K S Reynolds; C F Huang Journal: Med Care Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Martin Marshall; Rod Sheaff; Anne Rogers; Stephen Campbell; Shirley Halliwell; Susan Pickard; Bonnie Sibbald; Martin Roland Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Anne MacFarlane; Catherine O'Donnell; Frances Mair; Mary O'Reilly-de Brún; Tomas de Brún; Wolfgang Spiegel; Maria van den Muijsenbergh; Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten; Christos Lionis; Nicola Burns; Katja Gravenhorst; Christine Princz; Erik Teunissen; Francine van den Driessen Mareeuw; Aristoula Saridaki; Maria Papadakaki; Maria Vlahadi; Christopher Dowrick Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Gerald E Crites; Megan C McNamara; Elie A Akl; W Scott Richardson; Craig A Umscheid; James Nishikawa Journal: Health Res Policy Syst Date: 2009-03-26