Literature DB >> 12968823

Variations in hospitalization rates among nursing home residents: the role of discretionary hospitalizations.

Mary W Carter1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine variations in hospitalization rates among nursing home residents associated with discretionary hospitalization practices. DATA SOURCES: Quarterly Medicaid case-mix reimbursement data from the state of Massachusetts served as the core data source for this study, which was linked with data from the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file (MEDPAR) to specify hospitalization status, nursing facility attribute data from the state of Massachusetts to specify facility-level organizational and structural attributes, and data from the Area Resource File (ARF) to specify area market-level attributes. Data spans three years (1991-1993) to produce a longitudinal analytical file containing 72,319 person-quarter-level observations. STUDY
DESIGN: Two-step, multivariate logistic regression models were estimated for highly discretionary hospitalizations versus those containing less discretion, and low discretionary hospitalizations versus those containing greater amounts of physician discretion. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Findings indicate that facility case-mix levels and area hospital bed supply levels contribute to variations in hospitalization rates among nursing home residents. Highly discretionary hospitalizations appear to be most sensitive to patient diagnoses best described as chronic, ambulatory care sensitive conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that defining hospitalizations simply in terms of whether an event occurs versus otherwise may obscure valuable information regarding the contribution of various risk factors to highly discretionary versus low discretionary hospitalization rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968823      PMCID: PMC1360939          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  23 in total

1.  The determinants of the hospitalization of nursing home residents.

Authors:  M P Freiman; C M Murtaugh
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  On nursing home quality: a review and analysis.

Authors:  M A Davis
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1991

Review 3.  Medical care in the nursing home.

Authors:  J G Ouslander
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Small area analysis: a review and analysis of the North American literature.

Authors:  P Paul-Shaheen; J D Clark; D Williams
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.265

Review 5.  Hazards of hospitalization of the elderly.

Authors:  M C Creditor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Explaining geographic variations. The enthusiasm hypothesis.

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Hospital readmission rates for cohorts of Medicare beneficiaries in Boston and New Haven.

Authors:  E S Fisher; J E Wennberg; T A Stukel; S M Sharp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients.

Authors:  P W Shaughnessy; A M Kramer; R E Schlenker; M B Polesovsky
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Adjusting Medicare capitation payments using prior hospitalization data.

Authors:  A Ash; F Porell; L Gruenberg; E Sawitz; A Beiser
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989
View more
  9 in total

1.  Validation of the Minimum Data Set in identifying hospitalization events and payment source.

Authors:  Shubing Cai; Dana B Mukamel; Peter Veazie; Helena Temkin-Greener
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 4.669

2.  Hospitalizations at the end of life among long-term care residents.

Authors:  Verena H Menec; Scott Nowicki; Audrey Blandford; Dawn Veselyuk
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  The Impact of Medicaid Payer Status on Hospitalizations in Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Shubing Cai; Susan C Miller; Dallas L Nelson; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  PRagmatic trial Of Video Education in Nursing homes: The design and rationale for a pragmatic cluster randomized trial in the nursing home setting.

Authors:  Vincent Mor; Angelo E Volandes; Roee Gutman; Constantine Gatsonis; Susan L Mitchell
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Associations between published quality ratings of skilled nursing facilities and outcomes of medicare beneficiaries with heart failure.

Authors:  Kathleen T Unroe; Melissa A Greiner; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Eric D Peterson; Lesley H Curtis
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.669

6.  Can pay-for-performance take nursing home care to the next level?

Authors:  Becky A Briesacher; Terry S Field; Joann Baril; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Predictors of nursing home residents' time to hospitalization.

Authors:  A James O'Malley; Daryl J Caudry; David C Grabowski
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Age and sex differences in hospitalisation of nursing home residents: a systematic review.

Authors:  Falk Hoffmann; Katharina Allers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Older Persons' Transitions in Care (OPTIC): a study protocol.

Authors:  Greta G Cummings; R Colin Reid; Carole A Estabrooks; Peter G Norton; Garnet E Cummings; Brian H Rowe; Stephanie L Abel; Laura Bissell; Joan L Bottorff; Carole A Robinson; Adrian Wagg; Jacques S Lee; Susan L Lynch; Elmabrok Masaoud
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.