OBJECTIVE: To define and improve the performance of existing comorbidity scores in predicting mortality in Medicare enrollees. DATA SOURCES: Study participants were two Medicare populations who had complete drug coverage either through Medicaid or a statewide pharmacy assistance program: New Jersey Medicare enrollees (NNJ, = 235,881) and Pennsylvania Medicare enrollees (NPA = 230,913). STUDY DESIGN: Frequently used comorbidity scores were computed for all subjects during the baseline year (January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1994, and one year later in Pennsylvania). The study outcome was one-year mortality during the following year. Performance of scores was measured with the c-statistic derived from multivariate logistic regression models. Empirical weights were derived in the New Jersey population and the performance of scores with new weights was validated in the Pennsylvania population. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A score based on ICD-9-diagnoses (Romano) performed 60 percent better than one based on patterns of medication use (Chronic Disease Score, or CDS-1) (c = 0.771 vs. c = 0.703). The performance of the Romano score was further improved slightly by inclusion of the number of different prescription drugs used during the past year. Modeling the 17 conditions included in the Romano score as separate binary indicators increased its performance by 8 percent (c = 0.781). We derived elderly-specific weights for these scores in the New Jersey sample, including negative weights for the use of some drugs, for example, lipid lowering drugs. Applying these weights, the performance of Romano and CDS-1 scores improved in an independent validation sample of Pennsylvania Medicare enrollees by 8.3 percent and 43 percent compared to the scores with the original weights. When we added an indicator of nursing home residency, age, and gender, the Romano score reached a performance of c = 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in epidemiologic studies of the elderly, a modified diagnosis-based score using empirically derived weights provides improved adjustment for comorbidity and enhances the validity of findings.
OBJECTIVE: To define and improve the performance of existing comorbidity scores in predicting mortality in Medicare enrollees. DATA SOURCES: Study participants were two Medicare populations who had complete drug coverage either through Medicaid or a statewide pharmacy assistance program: New Jersey Medicare enrollees (NNJ, = 235,881) and Pennsylvania Medicare enrollees (NPA = 230,913). STUDY DESIGN: Frequently used comorbidity scores were computed for all subjects during the baseline year (January 1, 1994, to December 31, 1994, and one year later in Pennsylvania). The study outcome was one-year mortality during the following year. Performance of scores was measured with the c-statistic derived from multivariate logistic regression models. Empirical weights were derived in the New Jersey population and the performance of scores with new weights was validated in the Pennsylvania population. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A score based on ICD-9-diagnoses (Romano) performed 60 percent better than one based on patterns of medication use (Chronic Disease Score, or CDS-1) (c = 0.771 vs. c = 0.703). The performance of the Romano score was further improved slightly by inclusion of the number of different prescription drugs used during the past year. Modeling the 17 conditions included in the Romano score as separate binary indicators increased its performance by 8 percent (c = 0.781). We derived elderly-specific weights for these scores in the New Jersey sample, including negative weights for the use of some drugs, for example, lipid lowering drugs. Applying these weights, the performance of Romano and CDS-1 scores improved in an independent validation sample of Pennsylvania Medicare enrollees by 8.3 percent and 43 percent compared to the scores with the original weights. When we added an indicator of nursing home residency, age, and gender, the Romano score reached a performance of c = 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in epidemiologic studies of the elderly, a modified diagnosis-based score using empirically derived weights provides improved adjustment for comorbidity and enhances the validity of findings.
Authors: Mark T Osterman; Kevin Haynes; Elizabeth Delzell; Jie Zhang; Meenakshi Bewtra; Colleen M Brensinger; Lang Chen; Fenglong Xie; Jeffrey R Curtis; James D Lewis Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2007-05-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Christina Mavrogianni; George Moschonis; Eva Karaglani; Greet Cardon; Violeta Iotova; Pilar De Miguel-Etayo; Esther M González-Gil; Κaloyan Tsochev; Tsvetalina Tankova; Imre Rurik; Patrick Timpel; Emese Antal; Stavros Liatis; Konstantinos Makrilakis; George P Chrousos; Yannis Manios Journal: Eur J Pediatr Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 3.183
Authors: Joseph T Hanlon; Xinhua Zhao; Jennifer G Naples; Sherrie L Aspinall; Subashan Perera; David A Nace; Nicholas G Castle; Susan L Greenspan; Carolyn T Thorpe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alfredo J Selim; Dan Berlowitz; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Steven M Wright; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2009-12-30 Impact factor: 3.402