Joseph T Hanlon1,2,3,4,5, Xinhua Zhao1,2,4, Jennifer G Naples1,2,4, Sherrie L Aspinall1,2,4, Subashan Perera1,6, David A Nace1, Nicholas G Castle7, Susan L Greenspan1,8, Carolyn T Thorpe2,4. 1. Department of Medicine (Geriatrics), School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Departments of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 8. Department of Medicine (Endocrine), School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between CNS medication burden and serious falls in those with a recent fall history. DESIGN: Nested-case control study; cases matched to four controls by age, gender, and date. SETTING: US nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 5,556 residents age ≥65 with a recent fall history admitted to a nursing home between 1/1-9/30/2010 and followed until discharge, death, or December 31, 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome was serious falls as per Medicare Part A and B ICD/CPT codes. CNS burden, from Medicare Part D data, was calculated by dividing the daily dose of each CNS agent (i.e., specific antidepressants, antiepileptic, antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and opioid receptor agonists) received during the 6 days prior to the index (outcome) date by the minimum effective geriatric daily dose and summing the results across medications. RESULTS: There were 367 cases and 1,468 matched controls. Those taking 3 + CNS standardized daily doses were more likely to have a serious fall than those not taking any CNS medications (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.83; 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.48). There was no significant difference in fall risk for residents taking >0 to <3 CNS standardized daily doses compared to residents taking no CNS medications (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.63-1.15). CONCLUSION: CNS medication burden, approximately 3 + standardized daily doses, was associated with an increased risk of serious falls in nursing home residents with recent fall. Clinicians should be vigilant for opportunities to discontinue or decrease the doses of individual CNS medications and/or consider non-pharmacological alternatives. Such interventions that reduce use of CNS medications in nursing homes could reduce fall rates but further research is needed to confirm this.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between CNS medication burden and serious falls in those with a recent fall history. DESIGN: Nested-case control study; cases matched to four controls by age, gender, and date. SETTING: US nursing homes. PARTICIPANTS: 5,556 residents age ≥65 with a recent fall history admitted to a nursing home between 1/1-9/30/2010 and followed until discharge, death, or December 31, 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Outcome was serious falls as per Medicare Part A and B ICD/CPT codes. CNS burden, from Medicare Part D data, was calculated by dividing the daily dose of each CNS agent (i.e., specific antidepressants, antiepileptic, antipsychotic, benzodiazepine and opioid receptor agonists) received during the 6 days prior to the index (outcome) date by the minimum effective geriatric daily dose and summing the results across medications. RESULTS: There were 367 cases and 1,468 matched controls. Those taking 3 + CNS standardized daily doses were more likely to have a serious fall than those not taking any CNS medications (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.83; 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.48). There was no significant difference in fall risk for residents taking >0 to <3 CNS standardized daily doses compared to residents taking no CNS medications (Adjusted Odds Ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.63-1.15). CONCLUSION: CNS medication burden, approximately 3 + standardized daily doses, was associated with an increased risk of serious falls in nursing home residents with recent fall. Clinicians should be vigilant for opportunities to discontinue or decrease the doses of individual CNS medications and/or consider non-pharmacological alternatives. Such interventions that reduce use of CNS medications in nursing homes could reduce fall rates but further research is needed to confirm this.
Authors: Carolyn S Sterke; Ed F van Beeck; Nathalie van der Velde; Gijsbertus Ziere; Mirko Petrovic; Caspar W N Looman; Tischa J M van der Cammen Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: Allen R Huang; Louise Mallet; Christian M Rochefort; Tewodros Eguale; David L Buckeridge; Robyn Tamblyn Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Ettore Beghi; Giorgia Giussani; Salvatore Grosso; Alfonso Iudice; Angela La Neve; Francesco Pisani; Luigi M Specchio; Alberto Verrotti; Giuseppe Capovilla; Roberto Michelucci; Gaetano Zaccara Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Zachary A Marcum; Subashan Perera; Joshua M Thorpe; Galen E Switzer; Shelly L Gray; Nicholas G Castle; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Eleanor M Simonsick; Douglas C Bauer; Ronald I Shorr; Stephanie A Studenski; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 3.154
Authors: Joshua D Niznik; Xinhua Zhao; Meiqi He; Sherrie L Aspinall; Joseph T Hanlon; Laura C Hanson; David Nace; Joshua M Thorpe; Carolyn T Thorpe Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Barbara Resnick; Elizabeth Galik; Marie Boltz; Sarah Holmes; Steven Fix; Erin Vigne; Shijun Zhu; Regina Lewis Journal: Consult Pharm Date: 2018-06-01
Authors: Aimee N Pickering; Megan E Hamm; Alicia Dawdani; Joseph T Hanlon; Carolyn T Thorpe; Walid F Gellad; Thomas R Radomski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-02-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Daniel J Hoyle; Ivan K Bindoff; Lisa M Clinnick; Gregory M Peterson; Juanita L Westbury Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.923
Authors: Shelly L Gray; Zachary A Marcum; Sascha Dublin; Rod Walker; Negar Golchin; Dori E Rosenberg; Erin J Bowles; Paul Crane; Eric B Larson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-04-17 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Ron Carico; Xinhua Zhao; Carolyn T Thorpe; Joshua M Thorpe; Florentina E Sileanu; John P Cashy; Jennifer A Hale; Maria K Mor; Thomas R Radomski; Leslie R M Hausmann; Julie M Donohue; Katie J Suda; Kevin Stroupe; Joseph T Hanlon; Chester B Good; Michael J Fine; Walid F Gellad Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Sherrie L Aspinall; Sydney P Springer; Xinhua Zhao; Francesca E Cunningham; Carolyn T Thorpe; Todd P Semla; Ronald I Shorr; Joseph T Hanlon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-11 Impact factor: 5.562