Literature DB >> 12968676

Determinants of the size of incident vertebral deformities in European men and women in the sixth to ninth decades of age: the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

J Reeve1, M Lunt, D Felsenberg, A J Silman, C Scheidt-Nave, G Poor, C Gennari, K Weber, R Lorenc, P Masaryk, J B Cannata, J Dequeker, D M Reid, H A P Pols, L I Benevolenskaya, J J Stepan, T Miazgowski, A Bhalla, J Bruges Armas, R Eastell, A Lopes-Vaz, G Lyritis, I Jajic, A D Woolf, D Banzer, W Reisinger, C J Todd, B Felsch, S Havelka, K Hoszowski, J Janott, O Johnell, H H Raspe, O B Yershova, J A Kanis, G Armbrecht, J D Finn, W Gowin, T W O'Neill.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: More severe vertebral fractures have more personal impact. In the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study, more severe vertebral collapse was predictable from prior fracture characteristics. Subjects with bi-concave or crush fractures at baseline had a 2-fold increase in incident fracture size and thus increased risk of a disabling future fracture.
INTRODUCTION: According to Euler's buckling theory, loss of horizontal trabeculae in vertebrae increases the risk of fracture and suggests that the extent of vertebral collapse will be increased in proportion. We tested the hypothesis that the characteristics of a baseline deformity would influence the size of a subsequent deformity.
METHODS: In 207 subjects participating in the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study who suffered an incident spine fracture in a previously normal vertebra, we estimated loss of volume (fracture size) from plane film images of all vertebral bodies that were classified as having a new fracture. The sum of the three vertebral heights (anterior, mid-body, and posterior) obtained at follow-up was subtracted from the sum of the same measures at baseline. Each of the summed height loss for vertebrae with a McCloskey-Kanis deformity on the second film was expressed as a percentage. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: In univariate models, the numbers of baseline deformities and the clinical category of the most severe baseline deformity were each significantly associated with the size of the most severe incident fracture and with the cumulated sum of all vertebral height losses. In multivariate modeling, age and the clinical category of the baseline deformity (crush > bi-concave > uni-concave > wedge) were the strongest determinants of both more severe and cumulative height loss. Baseline biconcave and crush fractures were associated at follow-up with new fractures that were approximately twice as large as those seen with other types of deformity or who previously had undeformed spines. In conclusion, the characteristics of a baseline vertebral deformity determines statistically the magnitude of vertebral body volume lost when a subsequent fracture occurs. Because severity of fracture and number of fractures are determinants of impact, the results should improve prediction of the future personal impact of osteoporosis once a baseline prevalent deformity has been identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12968676     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.9.1664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

Review 1.  Detection of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Elliott N Schwartz; Dee Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  High precision semiautomated computed tomography measurement of lumbar disk and vertebral heights.

Authors:  Sovira Tan; Jianhua Yao; Lawrence Yao; Michael M Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Whom to treat? The contribution of vertebral X-rays to risk-based algorithms for fracture prediction. Results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  S Kaptoge; G Armbrecht; D Felsenberg; M Lunt; K Weber; S Boonen; I Jajic; J J Stepan; D Banzer; W Reisinger; J Janott; G Kragl; C Scheidt-Nave; B Felsch; C Matthis; H H Raspe; G Lyritis; G Póor; R Nuti; T Miazgowski; K Hoszowski; J Bruges Armas; A Lopes Vaz; L I Benevolenskaya; P Masaryk; J B Cannata; O Johnell; D M Reid; A Bhalla; A D Woolf; C J Todd; C Cooper; R Eastell; J A Kanis; T W O'Neill; A J Silman; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  [Kyphoplasty : method for minimally invasive treatment of painful vertebral fractures].

Authors:  C Kasperk; G Nöldge; P Meeder; P Nawroth; F X Huber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Fracture prevention in men.

Authors:  Piet Geusens; Philip Sambrook; Willem Lems
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Altered disc pressure profile after an osteoporotic vertebral fracture is a risk factor for adjacent vertebral body fracture.

Authors:  Michael N Tzermiadianos; Susan M Renner; Frank M Phillips; Alexander G Hadjipavlou; Michael R Zindrick; Robert M Havey; Michael Voronov; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Effect of gonadal status on bone mineral density and radiological spinal deformities in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency.

Authors:  Gherardo Mazziotti; Antonio Bianchi; Vincenzo Cimino; Stefania Bonadonna; Paola Martini; Alessandra Fusco; Laura De Marinis; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures.

Authors:  C Roux; J Fechtenbaum; S Kolta; K Briot; M Girard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  [Choosing wisely together with the patient].

Authors:  U R Fölsch; G Hasenfuß
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 0.743

10.  [Indications and results of kypho- and vertebroplasty].

Authors:  C Kasperk; G Nöldge; I Grafe; P Meeder; F Huber; P Nawroth
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.