Literature DB >> 12966475

Evaluation and comparison of 2 needle models in terms of blood aspiration during truncal block of the inferior alveolar nerve.

Esther Delgado-Molina1, Meritxell Tamarit-Borrás, Leonardo Berini-Aytés, Cosme Gay-Escoda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a study to determine the possible differences in blood aspiration between 2 needles of the same length and external gauge but with different internal gauges during truncal block of the inferior alveolar nerve. The working hypothesis was that increased blood aspiration may be expected with larger internal gauge needles.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four clinicians subjected 346 patients to inferior alveolar nerve block and infiltrating anesthesia of the buccal nerve trajectory for the surgical or conventional extraction of the lower third molar. A nonautoaspirating syringe system with 2 types of needle were used: a standard 27-gauge x 35-mm needle with an internal gauge of 0.215 mm and an XL Monoprotect (manufactured by Sofic, Mazamet, France, and distributed by Laboratorios Inibsa, Barcelona, Spain) 27-gauge x 35-mm needle with an internal gauge of 0.265 mm. The following information was recorded for each patient: needle type, gender, anesthetic technique (direct or indirect truncal block) and the number of bone contacts during the procedure, the patient-extraction side, the operator performing the technique, and blood aspiration (either positive or negative).
RESULTS: No significant differences (P <.05) were observed on contrasting the blood aspiration positivity with the internal gauge of the needles. Likewise, no significant differences were seen on correlating aspiration to the anesthetic technique used, the number of bone contacts, the operator, or the patient-extraction side. Blood aspiration was observed in 8.7% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were recorded in terms of blood aspiration and internal gauge, operator, patient-extraction side, or the anesthetic technique involved. Consequently, our initial working hypothesis can be rejected, because no increased percentage of blood aspirations was observed for greater internal gauges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966475     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00312-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  6 in total

1.  Movement control during aspiration with different injection systems via video monitoring-an in vitro model.

Authors:  P W Kämmerer; D Schneider; A A Pacyna; M Daubländer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Local anesthesia part 2: technical considerations.

Authors:  Kenneth L Reed; Stanley F Malamed; Andrea M Fonner
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

3.  Do length and gauge of dental needle affect success in performing an inferior alveolar nerve block during extraction of adult mandibular molars? A prospective, randomized observer-blind, clinical trial.

Authors:  Essam Ahmed Al-Moraissi; Abeer Mohammed Al-Selwi; Elham Aziz Al-Zendani
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  A prospective randomized clinical trial compared the effect of various types of local anesthetics cartridges on hypertensive patients during dental extraction.

Authors:  Nedal Abu-Mostafa; Abdullah Aldawssary; Ahmad Assari; Suliman Alnujaidy; Almutlaq Almutlaq
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-02-01

5.  Efficacy and complications associated with a modified inferior alveolar nerve block technique. A randomized, triple-blind clinical trial.

Authors:  Marta Montserrat-Bosch; Rui Figueiredo; Pedro Nogueira-Magalhães; Josep Arnabat-Dominguez; Eduard Valmaseda-Castellón; Cosme Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-07-01

6.  Hemodynamic changes following injection of local anesthetics with different concentrations of epinephrine during simple tooth extraction: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nedal Abu-Mostafa; Fatimah Al-Showaikhat; Fatimah Al-Shubbar; Kawther Al-Zawad; Fatimah Al-Zawad
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-10-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.