| Literature DB >> 12966432 |
H P Marsh1, N A Haldar, M Bunce, S E Marshall, K le Monier, S L Winsey, K Christodoulos, D Cranston, K I Welsh, A L Harris.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to assess the role of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) polymorphisms in the risk of developing bladder cancer and effect on tumour stage, grade and progression. In all, seven single-nucleotide polymorphisms in TNF were studied in 196 bladder cancer patients and 208 controls using a PCR-SSP genotyping technique. It was seen that there was a significant association of two polymorphisms in TNF with bladder cancer: the TNF+488A allele was found in 28.1% of patients compared with 14.9% of controls (P=0.0012). In addition, TNF-859T was found in 26.0% of patients compared with 14.4% of the controls (P=0.0036). The two loci were in tight linkage disequilibrium, that is, almost all the individuals having TNF+488A also had TNF-859T. Patients with the TNF+488A or TNF-859T were more likely to present with a moderately differentiated tumour than those patients without the uncommon allele. In all, 16.7% of patients with TNF+488A and 29.9% of patients without TNF+488A presented with a G1 tumour (P=0.015). A total of 14% of patients with TNF-859T and 30.5% of patients without TNF-859T presented with a G1 tumour (P=0.0043). There was no significant effect on time to first recurrence, stage progression or grade progression. In conclusion, a significant association between TNF polymorphisms TNF+488A and TNF-859T and risk of bladder cancer was detected in this study. Both these polymorphisms were associated with grade of tumour at presentation although there was no significant effect on subsequent tumour behaviour.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12966432 PMCID: PMC2376948 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinical information for bladder cancer patients (n=196)
| Age | |
| Median (range) (years) | 68 (30–92) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 151 |
| Female | 45 |
| No. of lesions at initial presentation ( | |
| 1 | 137 |
| 2 | 26 |
| 3 | 12 |
| >3 | 11 |
| Stage at initial presentation ( | |
| | 5 |
| a | 54 |
| 1 | 89 |
| 2 | 33 |
| 3 | 4 |
| Grade at initial presentation ( | |
| G1 | 50 |
| G2 | 92 |
| G3 | 49 |
Figure 1Polyacrylamide gel photograph showing TNF polymorphisms. Lanes 1–4 correspond to the four reactions used to identify the four previously documented haplotypes of the three biallelic polymorphisms, TNF+488, −238 and −308. The upper visible band is the control band. A positive reaction is seen in lanes 1 and 2, giving a result of TNF+488G, −238G, −308GA. Lanes 5–12 represent the remaining individual biallelic polymorphisms as follows: lanes 5 and 6: TNF−1032T,C; lanes 7 and 8: TNF−865C,A; lanes 9 and 10: TNF−859C,T; lanes 11 and 12: TNF−380G,A. In each case, the lower band is the control band. Positive reactions are seen in lanes 5,7,9 and 11 giving the result of TNF−1032T, −865C, −859C, and −380G.
PCR-SSP primer sequences, specificities and primer mix composition
| TNF+488G/−238G/−308G | 5′-g C A T C C C C g T C T T T C T C C A C | 0.51 | 5′ A T A g g T T T T g A g g g g C A T g g | 0.51 | 835 |
| TNF+488G/−238G/−308A | 5′-g C A T C C C C g T C T T T C T C C A C | 1.7 | 5′ A T A g g T T T T g A g g g g C A T g A | 1.7 | 835 |
| TNF+488G/−238A/−308G | 5′-g C A T C C C C g T C T T T C T C C A C | 0.85 | 5′ g A A g A C C C C C C T C g g A A T C A | 0.85 | 763 |
| TNF+488A/−238G/−308G | 5′-g C A T C C C C g T C T T T C T C C A T | 0.51 | 5′ g A A g A C C C C C C T C g g A A T C g | 0.51 | 763 |
| TNF−1032T | 5′-C C g g g A A T T C A C A g A C C C C | 3.4 | 5′-C A A A g g A g A A g C T g A g A A g A T | 3.4 | 433 |
| TNF−1032C | 5′-C C g g g A A T T C A C A g A C C C C | 3.4 | 5′-C A A A g g A g A A g C T g A g A A g A C | 3.4 | 433 |
| TNF−865C | 5′-C C g g g A A T T C A C A g A C C C C | 3.4 | 5′-C g A g T A T g g g g A C C C C C C | 3.4 | 263 |
| TNF−865A | 5′-C C g g g A A T T C A C A g A C C C C | 3.4 | 5′-g A g T A T g g g g A C C C C C A | 3.4 | 262 |
| TNF−859C | 5′-C T A C A T g g C C C T g T C T T C g | 5.1 | 5′-A A g g A T A A g g g C T C A g A g A g | 5.1 | 270 |
| TNF−859T | 5′-T C T A C A T g g C C C T g T C T T C A | 5.1 | 5′-A A g g A T A A g g g C T C A g A g A g | 5.1 | 270 |
| TNF−380G | 5′-g g C T g g g T g T g C C A A C A A C | 3.4 | 5′-C C T g C A T C C T g T C T g g A A g | 3.4 | 396 |
| TNF−380A | 5′-g g C T g g g T g T g C C A A C A A C | 3.4 | 5′-T C C T g C A T C C T g T C T g g A A A | 3.4 | 397 |
Phenotype frequencies for bladder cancer patients and controls; first and second sets
| TNF+488G | 107 | 100.0% | 99 | 100.0% | 100 | 99.0% | 95 | 97.9% | ||
| TNF+488A | 14 | 13.1% | 28 | 28.3% | 17 | 16.8% | 27 | 27.8% | ||
| TNF−238G | 106 | 99.1% | 99 | 100.0% | 100 | 99.0% | 97 | 100.0% | ||
| TNF−238A | 17 | 15.9% | 3 | 3.0% | 4 | 4.0% | 18 | 18.6% | ||
| TNF−308G | 106 | 99.1% | 98 | 99.0% | 97 | 96.0% | 95 | 97.9% | ||
| TNF−308A | 33 | 30.8% | 35 | 35.4% | 36 | 35.6% | 21 | 21.6% | ||
| TNF−1032T | 99 | 92.5% | 97 | 98.0% | 99 | 98.0% | ||||
| TNF−1032C | 47 | 43.9% | 36 | 36.4% | 32 | 31.7% | ||||
| TNF−865C | 105 | 98.1% | 98 | 99.0% | 100 | 99.0% | ||||
| TNF−865A | 32 | 29.9% | 26 | 26.3% | 27 | 26.7% | ||||
| TNF−859C | 107 | 100.0% | 99 | 100.0% | 99 | 98.0% | 95 | 97.9% | ||
| TNF−859T | 14 | 13.1% | 26 | 26.3% | 16 | 15.8% | 25 | 25.8% | ||
| TNF−380G | 107 | 100.0% | 99 | 100.0% | 101 | 100.0% | ||||
| TNF−380A | 4 | 3.7% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.0% | ||||
The significant results TNF+488 and TNF−859 are highlighted with a grey background.
Phenotype frequencies for combined controls, bladder cancer and melanoma patients
| TNF+488G | 207 | 208 | 99.5% | 194 | 196 | 99.0% | 91 | 91 | 100% | ||
| TNF+488A | 31 | 208 | 14.9% | 55 | 196 | 28.1% | 13 | 91 | 14% | ||
| TNF−238G | 206 | 208 | 99.0% | 196 | 196 | 100.0% | 91 | 91 | 100% | ||
| TNF−238A | 21 | 208 | 10.1% | 21 | 196 | 10.7% | 8 | 91 | 8.80% | ||
| TNF−308G | 203 | 208 | 97.6% | 193 | 196 | 98.5% | 90 | 91 | 99% | ||
| TNF−308A | 69 | 208 | 33.2% | 56 | 196 | 28.6% | 34 | 91 | 37% | ||
| TNF−1032T | 198 | 208 | 95.2% | 97 | 99 | 98.0% | 89 | 91 | 98% | ||
| TNF−1032C | 79 | 208 | 38.0% | 36 | 99 | 36.4% | 35 | 91 | 38% | ||
| TNF−865C | 205 | 208 | 98.6% | 98 | 99 | 99.0% | 89 | 91 | 98% | ||
| TNF−865A | 59 | 208 | 28.4% | 26 | 99 | 26.3% | 27 | 91 | 30% | ||
| TNF−859C | 206 | 208 | 99.0% | 194 | 196 | 99.0% | 91 | 91 | 100% | ||
| TNF−859T | 30 | 208 | 14.4% | 51 | 196 | 26.0% | 13 | 91 | 14% | ||
| TNF−380G | 208 | 208 | 100.0% | 99 | 99 | 100.0% | 91 | 91 | 100% | ||
| TNF−380A | 5 | 208 | 2.4% | 0 | 99 | 0.0% | 5 | 91 | 5% | ||
The significant results TNF+488 and TNF−859 are highlighted with a grey background.
Relationship between grade of tumour at presentation and TNF−859, TNF+488 polymorphism (information available on 191 of 196 patients)
| G1 | (7) | 14.0% | (43) | 30.5% | (50) | 26.2% |
| G2 | (34) | 68.0% | (58) | 41.1% | (92) | 48.2% |
| G3 | (9) | 18.0% | (40) | 28.4% | (49) | 25.6% |
| 50 | 26.2% | 141 | 73.8% | 191 | ||
| G1 | (9) | 16.7% | (41) | 29.9% | (50) | 26.2% |
| G2 | (35) | 64.8% | (57) | 41.6% | (92) | 48.2% |
| G3 | (10) | 18.5% | (39) | 28.5% | (49) | 25.6% |
| 54 | 28.3% | 137 | 71.7% | 191 | ||