Literature DB >> 12966380

Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic Bankart repair for selected cases: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Seung-Ho Kim1, Kwon-Ick Ha, Min-Wook Jung, Moon-Sup Lim, Young-Min Kim, Jong-Hyuk Park.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increased stress within a certain limit enhances ligament healing and improves joint function. In this prospective randomized clinical trial, we compared the clinical results of early motion versus conventional immobilization after arthroscopic Bankart repair in a selected patient population. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: We performed an arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors in 62 patients with traumatic recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder. Patients were randomized into 2 groups; group 1 (28 patients; mean age, 28 years) was managed with 3 weeks of immobilization using an abduction sling and conventional rehabilitation program, and group 2 (34 patients; mean age, 29 years) was managed with an accelerated rehabilitation program that consisted of staged range of motion and strengthening exercises from the immediate postoperative day. Selection criteria were nonathletes with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation and a classic Bankart lesion with a robust labrum limited to 1 cm from the midglenoid notch. The patients were followed up for a mean of 31 months (range, 27 to 45 months; standard deviation, 9 months). Analysis of outcome included pain scores at 6 weeks and at final follow-up evaluation, range of motion, return to activity, recurrence rate, patient satisfaction with each rehabilitation program, and shoulder scores assessed by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Index, the rating system of the University of California at Los Angeles, and another scoring system.
RESULTS: The recurrence rate was not different between the 2 groups (P =.842). None of the groups developed recurrent dislocation. Two patients from each group were positive for anterior apprehension signs. Patients who underwent accelerated rehabilitation resumed functional range of motion faster (P <.001) and returned earlier to the functional level of activity (P <.001). Accelerated rehabilitation decreased postoperative pain (P =.013), and more patients were satisfied with this program (P <.001). Shoulder scores, return to activity, pain score, and range of motion were not different between the 2 groups at the final follow-up evaluation (P >.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Early mobilization of the operated shoulder after arthroscopic Bankart repair does not increase the recurrence rate in a selected group of patients. Although the final outcomes are approximately the same for both groups, the accelerated rehabilitation program promotes functional recovery and reduces postoperative pain, which allows patients an early return to desired activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966380     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00397-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  17 in total

1.  The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients.

Authors:  Billy Kan-Yip Law; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Eric Po-Yan Ho; Joseph Jeremy Hsi-Tse Chang; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Cyclic loading comparison of Bio-SutureTak-#2 FiberWire and Bio Mini-Revo-#2 Hi-Fi suture anchor-sutures in cadaveric scapulae.

Authors:  Brad S Sparks; John Nyland; Akbar Nawab; Ethan Blackburn; Ryan Krupp; Robert Burden
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Accelerated rehabilitation after arthroscopic Bankart repair in professional footballers.

Authors:  Jo Gibson; Jim Kerss; Chris Morgan; Peter Brownson
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-04-29

Review 4.  [Rehabilitation concepts and return to sport after interventions on the shoulder].

Authors:  K E Dreinhöfer; S Schüler; M Schäfer; T Ohly
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Current Concepts in Rehabilitation for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability.

Authors:  Richard Ma; Olubusola A Brimmo; Xinning Li; Lindsey Colbert
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

6.  A criterion based sling weaning progression (sweap) and outcomes following shoulder arthroscopic surgery in an active duty military population.

Authors:  Justin M Hire; Joshua E Pniewski; Michelle L Dickston; Jeremy M Jacobs; Terry L Mueller; Brian E Abell; John A Bojescul
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

7.  Do patients with minor shoulder instability have a different outcome from those with recurrent anteroinferior instability?

Authors:  Tom Depovere; Nicole Pouliart
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-27

Review 8.  Surgical treatment outcomes after primary vs recurrent anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  Jonathan D Barlow; Timothy Grosel; John Higgins; Joshua S Everhart; Robert A Magnussen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-22

Review 9.  An assessment of quality of randomized controlled trials in shoulder instability surgery using a modification of the clear CLEAR-NPT score.

Authors:  Hassanin Alkaduhimi; Aimane Saarig; Just A van der Linde; Nienke W Willigenburg; Derek F P van Deurzen; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-01-31

Review 10.  High Variability of the Definition of Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability: An Analysis of the Current Literature by a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hassanin Alkaduhimi; James W Connelly; Derek F P van Deurzen; Denise Eygendaal; Michel P J van den Bekerom
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-04-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.