Literature DB >> 31250226

Do patients with minor shoulder instability have a different outcome from those with recurrent anteroinferior instability?

Tom Depovere1, Nicole Pouliart2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minor or anterosuperior shoulder instability (MSI) is a relatively new concept with other characteristics than recurrent anteroinferior instability (TUBS). MSI includes patients without history of dislocation, with non-specific clinical symptoms and signs but with indications of laxity of (SGHL)/MGHL with isolated injury of (SGHL)/MGHL seen during arthroscopy. TUBS patients typically present with recurrent anteroinferior instability with at least labral injury of the anterior band of the IGHL. In this study, we focus on the postoperative (rehabilitation) course. Our hypothesis is that its duration is prolonged in patients with MSI when compared to those with TUBS.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients with isolated anterosuperior capsuloligamentous lesions identified during arthroscopic surgery (group I-MSI) and 65 with at least an anteroinferior capsuloligamentous lesion (group II-TUBS) completed a survey that included a questionnaire enquiring into relief of pain and return to activity, the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability index (WOSI). Final follow-up occurred at a mean of 76 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Pain at night, at rest and during overhead activities disappeared later in group I than in group II (respectively, p = 0.03; 0.01; 0.01). Patients with MSI returned later to professional activities (p = 0.02) and to the same sport (p = 0.01). In addition, they had worse outcome as measured by OSIS (p = 0.01) and WOSI (p = 0.07).
CONCLUSION: Patients with MSI have poorer prospects regarding time to relief of pain, return to work and sports and outcome scores compared to patients with TUBS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minor shoulder instability; Outcome score; Return to work and sport; Shoulder instability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31250226     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02484-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  27 in total

1.  Early results of Bankart repair with a patient-controlled rehabilitation program.

Authors:  D M McDermott; L Neumann; S P Frostick; W A Wallace
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Minor shoulder instability.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Ulf Nordenson; Raffaele Garofalo; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Recurrent shoulder instability among athletes: changes in quality of life, sports activity, and muscle function following open repair.

Authors:  Rupert Meller; Christian Krettek; Thomas Gösling; Knut Wähling; Michael Jagodzinski; Johannes Zeichen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Arthroscopic Bankart shoulder stabilization in athletes: return to sports and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Antoine Gerometta; Claudio Rosso; Shahnaz Klouche; Philippe Hardy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Results of arthroscopic repair of type II superior labral anterior posterior lesions in overhead athletes: assessment of return to preinjury playing level and satisfaction.

Authors:  Brian J Neuman; C Brittany Boisvert; Brian Reiter; Kevin Lawson; Michael G Ciccotti; Steven B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder: long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Alexandra Kirkley; Robert Werstine; Andrew Ratjek; Sharon Griffin
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Return to play after Type II superior labral anterior-posterior lesion repairs in athletes: a systematic review.

Authors:  William M Sayde; Steven B Cohen; Michael G Ciccotti; Christopher C Dodson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Sports ability after Bankart procedure in professional athletes.

Authors:  A Pavlik; D Csépai; P Hidas; A Bánóczy
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Immunohistochemical approach for the investigation of nerve distribution in the shoulder joint capsule.

Authors:  T Hashimoto; T Hamada; Y Sasaguri; K Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair: Minimum 10 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Tapio Flinkkilä; Rony Knape; Kai Sirniö; Pasi Ohtonen; Juhana Leppilahti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pathology and surgical outcomes of unstable painful shoulders.

Authors:  Shota Hoshika; Keisuke Matsuki; Morihito Tokai; Takeshi Morioka; Yusuke Ueda; Hiroshige Hamada; Norimasa Takahashi; Hiroyuki Sugaya
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-02-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.