Literature DB >> 12965036

Evolutionary models of phylogenetic trees.

Iosif Pinelis1.   

Abstract

The most widely used evolutionary model for phylogenetic trees is the equal-rates Markov (ERM) model. A problem is that the ERM model predicts less imbalance than observed for trees inferred from real data; in fact, the observed imbalance tends to fall between the values predicted by the ERM model and those predicted by the proportional-to-distinguishable-arrangements (PDA) model. Here, a continuous multi-rate (MR) family of evolutionary models is presented which contains entire subfamilies corresponding to both the PDA and ERM models. Furthermore, this MR family covers an entire range from 'completely balanced' to 'completely unbalanced' models. In particular, the MR family contains other known evolutionary models. The MR family is very versatile and virtually free of assumptions on the character of evolution; yet it is highly susceptible to rigorous analyses. In particular, such analyses help to uncover adaptability, quasi-stabilization and prolonged stasis as major possible causes of the imbalance. However, the MR model is functionally simple and requires only three parameters to reproduce the observed imbalance.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12965036      PMCID: PMC1691382          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models.

Authors:  M Steel; A McKenzie
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils.

Authors:  Pamela S Soltis; Douglas E Soltis; Vincent Savolainen; Peter R Crane; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Inferring speciation rates from phylogenies.

Authors:  S Nee
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Genome evolution in bacterial endosymbionts of insects.

Authors:  Jennifer J Wernegreen
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Signatures of random and selective mass extinctions in phylogenetic tree balance.

Authors:  Stephen B Heard; Arne Ø Mooers
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies.

Authors:  S Nee; A O Mooers; P H Harvey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies.

Authors:  S Nee; E C Holmes; R M May; P H Harvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The reconstructed evolutionary process.

Authors:  S Nee; R M May; P H Harvey
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-05-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  50 million years of genomic stasis in endosymbiotic bacteria.

Authors:  Ivica Tamas; Lisa Klasson; Björn Canbäck; A Kristina Näslund; Ann-Sofie Eriksson; Jennifer J Wernegreen; Jonas P Sandström; Nancy A Moran; Siv G E Andersson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Calculations for multi-type age-dependent binary branching processes.

Authors:  Graham Jones
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 2.259

2.  Clades and clans: a comparison study of two evolutionary models.

Authors:  Sha Zhu; Cuong Than; Taoyang Wu
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Scale-invariant topology and bursty branching of evolutionary trees emerge from niche construction.

Authors:  Chi Xue; Zhiru Liu; Nigel Goldenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimating the relative order of speciation or coalescence events on a given phylogeny.

Authors:  Tanja Gernhard; Daniel Ford; Rutger Vos; Mike Steel
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 1.625

5.  Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification.

Authors:  Rampal S Etienne; James Rosindell
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  Scaling properties of protein family phylogenies.

Authors:  Alejandro Herrada; Víctor M Eguíluz; Emilio Hernández-García; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Age-dependent speciation can explain the shape of empirical phylogenies.

Authors:  Oskar Hagen; Klaas Hartmann; Mike Steel; Tanja Stadler
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Universal scaling in the branching of the tree of life.

Authors:  E Alejandro Herrada; Claudio J Tessone; Konstantin Klemm; Víctor M Eguíluz; Emilio Hernández-García; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Towards sub-quadratic time and space complexity solutions for the dated tree reconciliation problem.

Authors:  Benjamin Drinkwater; Michael A Charleston
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Sound Colless-like balance indices for multifurcating trees.

Authors:  Arnau Mir; Lucía Rotger; Francesc Rosselló
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.