Literature DB >> 12965031

Genotype and extra-pair paternity in the house wren: a rare-male effect?

Brian S Masters1, Bonnie G Hicks, L Scott Johnson, Lori A Erb.   

Abstract

Females in socially monogamous species may select extra-pair (EP) mates to increase the heterozygosity, and hence fitness, of their offspring. We tested this hypothesis in the house wren (Troglodytes aedon), a largely monogamous songbird in which EP young are common. We typed paired males and females, nestlings, and males on neighbouring territories, at five to seven microsatellite loci over 2 years in a Wyoming, USA, population. We identified EP sires at 20 nests with EP young. In pairwise comparisons, we found no significant differences between cuckolded within-pair (WP) males and EP sires in three measures of heterozygosity (mean d2, standardized heterozygosity and internal relatedness). However, EP sires had fewer alleles that were common within the population than did the WP males they cuckolded. Nearby males who were EP sires also had fewer common alleles than did nearby males who did not sire EP young. Females in our population may be more prone to accept copulations from males with rare genotypes than from males with common genotypes. Alternatively, selection of rare-male sperm may occur within the female reproductive tract. Because mating with rare males is likely to increase offspring heterozygosity, our data suggest that EP mating may provide genetic benefits to females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12965031      PMCID: PMC1691390          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Polyandrous females avoid costs of inbreeding.

Authors:  Tom Tregenza; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The influence of parental relatedness on reproductive success.

Authors:  W Amos; J W Wilmer; K Fullard; T M Burg; J P Croxall; D Bloch; T Coulson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review.

Authors:  T Tregenza; N Wedell
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds.

Authors:  Donald Blomqvist; Malte Andersson; Clemens Küpper; Innes C Cuthill; János Kis; Richard B Lanctot; Brett K Sandercock; Tamás Székely; Johan Wallander; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations.

Authors:  B Charlesworth; M Nordborg; D Charlesworth
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer.

Authors:  T N Coulson; J M Pemberton; S D Albon; M Beaumont; T C Marshall; J Slate; F E Guinness; T H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  'Good genes as heterozygosity': the major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

Authors:  C Landry; D Garant; P Duchesne; L Bernatchez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inbreeding depression in the wild.

Authors:  P Crnokrak; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Inbreeding depression and male fitness in black grouse.

Authors:  Jacob Höglund; Stuart B Piertney; Rauno V Alatalo; Johan Lindell; Arne Lundberg; Pekka T Rintamäki
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Correlation between the individual heterozygosity of parents and their offspring.

Authors:  J B Mitton; W S Schuster; E G Cothran; J C De Fries
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  7 in total

1.  Adaptive genetic complementarity in mate choice coexists with selection for elaborate sexual traits.

Authors:  Kevin P Oh; Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Female choice for genetic complementarity in birds: a review.

Authors:  Herman L Mays; Tomas Albrecht; Mark Liu; Geoffrey E Hill
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Heterozygosity and its unexpected correlations with hybrid sterility.

Authors:  Amanda J Moehring
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Increased extra-pair paternity in broods of aging males and enhanced recruitment of extra-pair young in a migratory bird.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Anna M Forsman; Brian S Masters; Bonnie G P Johnson; L Scott Johnson; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Reed bunting females increase fitness through extra-pair mating with genetically dissimilar males.

Authors:  Stefan M Suter; Martin Keiser; Raoul Feignoux; Dietrich R Meyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Genetic and environmental variation in condition, cutaneous immunity, and haematocrit in house wrens.

Authors:  Scott K Sakaluk; Alastair J Wilson; E Keith Bowers; L Scott Johnson; Brian S Masters; Bonnie G P Johnson; Laura A Vogel; Anna M Forsman; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Physically challenging song traits, male quality, and reproductive success in house wrens.

Authors:  Emily R A Cramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.