Literature DB >> 12963643

Prospective assessment of late conduction recurrence across radiofrequency lesions producing electrical disconnection at the pulmonary vein ostium in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Riccardo Cappato1, Silvia Negroni, Domenico Pecora, Stefano Bentivegna, Pier Paolo Lupo, Adriana Carolei, Cristina Esposito, Francesco Furlanello, Luigi De Ambroggi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing radiofrequency (RF) electrical disconnection of multiple pulmonary veins (PVs), the incidence of late conduction recurrences has not been systematically determined. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using a prospectively designed, multistep approach, we aimed at assessing the correlation between acute achievement and chronic maintenance of electrical conduction block across RF lesions disconnecting the distal tract of the PV in 43 patients (52.3+/-8.2 years) with AF. Forty-one left superior (LS), 42 right superior (RS), 25 left inferior (LI), and 9 right inferior (RI) PVs were targeted during 108 EP procedures (2.6+/-0.5 per patient). Seventeen patients underwent 2 procedures, 23 patients underwent 3 procedures, and 3 patients underwent 4 procedures. During the first attempt, electrical disconnection was achieved in 112 PVs (95.7%). During a next procedure (time interval, 4.6+/-1.9 months), conduction recurrence was observed in 32 of 39 LSPVs (82.1%), 29 of 40 RSPVs (72.5%), 20 of 24 LIPVs (83.3%), and 7 of 9 RIPV (77.8%). After reablation at gap sites, a later procedure (time interval, 5.1+/-2.4 months) revealed a second recurrence in 13 of 22 LSPVs (59.1%) and 14 of 19 RSPVs (73.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Conduction recurrence across disconnecting RF lesions can be observed in approximately 80% of cases 4 months after ablation. After reablation, similar recurrence rates are observed 5 months later. This high rate of late conduction recurrence may contribute significantly to AF recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation aiming at disconnection of multiple PVs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12963643     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000091081.19465.F1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  83 in total

1.  Efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation with a novel hot balloon ablation catheter.

Authors:  Rudolph F Evonich; David M Nori; David E Haines
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Chronic performance of a novel radiofrequency ablation device on the beating heart: Limitations of conduction delay to assess transmurality.

Authors:  Anson M Lee; Abdulhameed Aziz; Kal L Clark; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  The importance of catheter stability evaluated by Visitag(TM) during pulmonary vein isolation.

Authors:  Ryudo Fujiwara; Kimitake Imamura; Yoichi Kijima; Tomoya Masano; Ryoji Nagoshi; Amane Kohzuki; Hiroyuki Shibata; Yoshiro Tsukiyama; Ryo Takeshige; Kenichi Yanaka; Shinsuke Nakano; Yusuke Fukuyama; Junya Shite
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Targeting atrio-atrial conduction in the post-orthotopic heart transplant patient.

Authors:  Pipin Kojodjojo; Prapa Kangaratnam; Vias Markides; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Gaps in the ablation line as a potential cause of recovery from electrical isolation and their visualization using MRI.

Authors:  Ravi Ranjan; Ritsushi Kato; Menekhem M Zviman; Timm M Dickfeld; Ariel Roguin; Ronald D Berger; Gordon F Tomaselli; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-04-14

6.  Randomized comparison of contact force-guided versus conventional circumferential pulmonary vein isolation of atrial fibrillation: prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of electrical reconnections and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Kohki Nakamura; Shigeto Naito; Takehito Sasaki; Masahiro Nakano; Kentaro Minami; Yosuke Nakatani; Kentaro Ikeda; Eiji Yamashita; Koji Kumagai; Nobusada Funabashi; Shigeru Oshima
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Pulmonary vein re-isolation for atrial fibrillation using duty-cycled phased radiofrequency ablation: safety and efficacy of a primary 2:1 bipolar/unipolar ablation mode.

Authors:  Marcus Wieczorek; Reinhard Hoeltgen; Shahram Tajtaraghi; Wolfgang Lawrenz; Michael Lukat
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by mesh catheter.

Authors:  Claudio Pratola; Pasquale Notarstefano; Paolo Artale; Tiziano Toselli; Elisa Baldo; Lina Marcantoni; Chiara Carrescia; Paolo Squasi; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Percutaneous pulmonary vein cryoablation to treat atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Tom Wong; Vias Markides; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.