Literature DB >> 12961075

[Load resistance of mandibular angle fracturs treated with a miniplate osteosynthesis].

K L Gerlach1, A Schwarz.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the load resistance of mandibular angle fractures treated with a miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated 22 completely dentate patients with fractures of the angle in addition to 15 controls. An electric test procedure for the determination of the load resistance between the incisors, canines and molars was carried out 1-6 weeks after treatment.
RESULTS: At 1 week postoperatively 90 N was registered between the molars while after 6 weeks this was 148 N. This revealed only 31% and 58% of the maximal vertical load found in the controls, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The minipate osteosynthesis according to Champy offers a secure method in the treatment of mandibular angle fractures with sufficient stability. Maximum voluntary bite forces were not registered during the time of healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12961075     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-003-0487-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir        ISSN: 1432-9417


  9 in total

1.  The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures. An in vitro study.

Authors:  F H Kroon; M Mathisson; J R Cordey; B A Rahn
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  The effect of orthognathic surgery on occlusal force.

Authors:  W R Proffit; T A Turvey; H W Fields; C Phillips
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  [Load bearing capacity after miniplate osteosynthesis of mandibular fractures].

Authors:  K L Gerlach; H D Pape; P Nussbaum
Journal:  Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1984 Sep-Oct

4.  One- or two-plate fixation of mandibular angle fractures?

Authors:  H P Schierle; R Schmelzeisen; B Rahn; C Pytlik
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate.

Authors:  E Ellis; L R Walker
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  Fracture line stability as a function of the internal fixation system: an in vitro comparison using a mandibular angle fracture model.

Authors:  V Shetty; D McBrearty; M Fourney; A A Caputo
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Mandibular osteosynthesis by miniature screwed plates via a buccal approach.

Authors:  M Champy; J P Loddé; R Schmitt; J H Jaeger; D Muster
Journal:  J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1978-02

8.  Bite forces in patients treated for mandibular angle fractures: implications for fixation recommendations.

Authors:  G S Tate; E Ellis; G Throckmorton
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Monocortical miniplate fixation of mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  F E Levy; R W Smith; R M Odland; L J Marentette
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-02
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new optical measuring system for experiments on fractured human mandibles: a biomechanical feasibility study in maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  T Steiner; S Raith; S Eichhorn; S Doebele; S Trainotti; S Müller; M Eder; L Kovacs; R Burgkart; K-D Wolff; F Hölzle
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Fixation of mandibular angle fractures: clinical studies.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-11-24

3.  Locking v/s non-locking reconstruction plates in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Bhupendra Harjani; R K Singh; U S Pal; Geeta Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.