Literature DB >> 12960803

Pathologic review of negative sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients with regional recurrence: a clinicopathologic study of 1152 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Ling-Xi L Li1, Richard A Scolyer, Vivian S K Ka, J Gregory McKinnon, Helen M Shaw, Stanley W McCarthy, John F Thompson.   

Abstract

A sentinel lymph node (SLN) that is melanoma negative by pathologic examination implies absence of melanoma metastasis to that regional lymph node field. However, a small proportion of patients develop regional node field recurrence after a negative SLN biopsy. In this study, we reviewed the histopathology of negative SLNs from such patients to determine whether occult melanoma cells were present in the SLNs, to characterize the pathologic features of false-negative SLNs, and to provide recommendations for the histopathologic examination of these specimens. Between March 1992 and June 2001, of 1152 patients who had undergone SLN biopsy for primary melanomas at the Sydney Melanoma Unit, 976 were diagnosed with negative SLNs by initial pathologic examination (using 2 hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, and 2 immunostained sections for S-100 protein and HMB45), and follow-up was available in 957. Of these, 26 (2.7%) developed regional lymph node recurrence during a median follow-up period of 35.7 months. For 22 of them, the original slides and tissue blocks were available for reexamination. The original slides of each block were reviewed. Multiple further sections were cut from each block and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, for S-100, HMB45, and Melan A. Deposits of occult melanoma cells were detected in 7 of the 22 cases (31.8%). In 5 of the 7 cases, deposits of melanoma cells were present only in the recut sections. There were no significant differences in clinical and pathologic variables for those patients in whom occult melanoma cells were found by pathologic reexamination of their SLNs, compared with those in whom no melanoma cells were detected. The detection of melanoma cell deposits in only 7 of 22 false-negative SLNs suggests that mechanisms other than failure of histopathologic examination may contribute to the failure of the SLN biopsy technique in some patients. The failure rate for melanoma detection in SLNs by our routine pathologic examination, using the current protocol at our institution, was <1% (7 of 957 patients). Routinely performing more intensive histopathologic examination of SLNs is difficult to justify from a cost benefit perspective; we therefore recommend examining two hematoxylin and eosin stained sections and two immunostained sections (for S-100 and HMB45) routinely on SLNs from melanoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12960803     DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200309000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  12 in total

1.  "Stealth" melanoma cells in histology-negative sentinel lymph nodes.

Authors:  Eijun Itakura; Rong-Rong Huang; Duan-Ren Wen; Alistair J Cochran
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy progress in surgical treatment of cancer.

Authors:  T Schulze; A Bembenek; P M Schlag
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of melanoma.

Authors:  Farin Amersi; Donald L Morton
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2007

4.  Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Richard A Scolyer; Kenneth R Hess; Vernon K Sondak; Georgina V Long; Merrick I Ross; Alexander J Lazar; Mark B Faries; John M Kirkwood; Grant A McArthur; Lauren E Haydu; Alexander M M Eggermont; Keith T Flaherty; Charles M Balch; John F Thompson
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Predictors and Survival Impact of False-Negative Sentinel Nodes in Melanoma.

Authors:  David Y Lee; Kelly T Huynh; Annabelle Teng; Briana J Lau; Sarah Vitug; Ji-Hey Lee; Stacey L Stern; Leland J Foshag; Mark B Faries
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Increasing Age Is Associated with Worse Prognostic Factors and Increased Distant Recurrences despite Fewer Sentinel Lymph Node Positives in Melanoma.

Authors:  A J Page; A Li; A Hestley; D Murray; G W Carlson; K A Delman
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-18

7.  Sentinel node status in melanoma patients is not predictive for overall survival upon multivariate analysis.

Authors:  F Roka; H Kittler; P Cauzig; C Hoeller; G Hinterhuber; K Wolff; H Pehamberger; E Diem
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Data set for pathology reporting of cutaneous invasive melanoma: recommendations from the international collaboration on cancer reporting (ICCR).

Authors:  Richard A Scolyer; Meagan J Judge; Alan Evans; David P Frishberg; Victor G Prieto; John F Thompson; Martin J Trotter; Maureen Y Walsh; Noreen M G Walsh; David W Ellis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  Molecular imaging and therapy of merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Volkan Beylergil; Jorge A Carrasquillo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Confirmation of sentinel lymph node identity by analysis of fine-needle biopsy samples using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alison Beavis; Michael Dawson; Philip Doble; Richard A Scolyer; Roger Bourne; Ling-Xi L Li; Rajmohan Murali; Jonathan R Stretch; Cynthia L Lean; Roger F Uren; John F Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.