Literature DB >> 10064757

Laparoscopic treatment vs open surgery in the solution of major incisional and abdominal wall hernias with mesh.

M A Carbajo1, J C Martín del Olmo, J I Blanco, C de la Cuesta, M Toledano, F Martin, C Vaquero, L Inglada.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite being one of the most exact indications, laparoscopic treatment of eventrations and ventral hernias is barely known among the array of laparoscopic techniques.
METHODS: A total of 60 patients were assigned at random over a 3-year period to two homogeneous groups to be operated on for major ventral hernias with mesh. Half of them were operated upon laparoscopically and the rest with open surgery. Early and longer-term complications were analyzed, as were operative time and postoperative hospital stays.
RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. The group that was operated on laparoscopically presented a lower rate of postoperative and longer-term complications; similarly, surgery time was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Hospitalization time was also significantly lower than in the group undergoing conventional open surgery (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic treatment of postoperative eventration and primary ventral hernia reduces complications and relapse rates, eliminates reintervention through mesh infection, reduces operative time, and considerably shortens the hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10064757     DOI: 10.1007/s004649900956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  107 in total

1.  Laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  M A Carbajo Caballero; J C Martín del Olmo; J I Blanco Alvarez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  What is the appropriate mesh for laparoscopic intraperitoneal repair of abdominal wall hernia?

Authors:  M A Carbajo; J C Martín del Olmo; J Blanco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Therapeutic value of laparoscopic adhesiolysis.

Authors:  M A Carbajo Caballero; J C Martín del Olmo; J I Blanco; F Martín; M T Cuesta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Umbilical hernia in adults.

Authors:  H Lau; N G Patil
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with intracorporeal suturing.

Authors:  S Schluender; J Conrad; C M Divino; B Gurland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of two composite meshes using two fixation devices in a porcine laparoscopic ventral hernia repair model.

Authors:  A J Duffy; N J Hogle; K M LaPerle; D L Fowler
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Medical effectiveness and safety of conventional compared to laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Stephanie Roll; Meik Friedrich; Juergen Zieren; Thomas Reinhold; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg; Wolfgang Greiner; Stefan N Willich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Postoperative surgical site infections after ventral/incisional hernia repair: a comparison of open and laparoscopic outcomes.

Authors:  Christodoulos Kaoutzanis; Stefan W Leichtle; Nicolas J Mouawad; Kathleen B Welch; Richard M Lampman; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Current status of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  D S Thoman; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Open vs laparoscopic repair of secondary lumbar hernias: a prospective nonrandomized study.

Authors:  A Moreno-Egea; J A Torralba-Martinez; G Morales; T Fernández; E Girela; J L Aguayo-Albasini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.