Literature DB >> 12957559

On reducing hand impact force in forward falls: results of a brief intervention in young males.

J Lo1, G N McCabe, K M DeGoede, H Okuizumi, J A Ashton-Miller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the working hypotheses that after a brief (10 min) intervention, (a) young adults can volitionally reduce fall-related wrist impact forces, and (b) no difference in impact force would exist between intervention and control groups at 3-weeks or 3-months follow-up.
BACKGROUND: The wrist is the most commonly fractured site in the body at any age, most often as a result of impact with the ground while arresting a forward fall.Methods. Twenty-nine healthy young male volunteers participated. A 3-month intervention group (n=10) performed five standardized forward falls before and after a 10-min instructional intervention aimed at reducing wrist impact forces during the baseline visit. They, along with a 3-month control group (n=11) who did not receive the intervention, were remeasured in five trials at 3-weeks and 3-months follow-up, without intervening practice. A baseline control group (n=8) performed the five trials, then repeated them at the baseline visit without receiving the intervention. Unilateral body segment kinematics and bilateral hand-ground impact forces were measured and the hypotheses were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance.
RESULTS: At the baseline visit, a significant group-by-trial-block interaction was found (P=0.02): the 3-month intervention group reduced their average maximum impact forces by 18% from initial values (P=0.002); the baseline control group did not do so (0.5% increase, P=0.91). The 3-month intervention (20 falls) and control (15 falls) groups did not differ at the 3-month follow-up (P=0.62); however, when the groups were combined their maximum impact force had decreased significantly (8.9%, P=0.04) over that time.
CONCLUSIONS: Healthy young males learned in 10 min to significantly reduce wrist impact forces in forward falls, but retention was poor at 3-weeks follow-up. Irrespective of group, however, after the 5 falls at 3-weeks subjects had taught themselves to reduce their impact forces at the 3-months follow-up. RELEVANCE: A brief educational intervention can significantly reduce forward fall-related impact forces in the short term. However, with or without the brief intervention, the experience of performing between 5-10 forward falls 3 weeks apart apparently resulted in decreased impact forces over the next 2 months, thereby reducing the risk of injury in these forward falls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12957559     DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(03)00124-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  9 in total

1.  Pressure distribution over the palm region during forward falls on the outstretched hands.

Authors:  W J Choi; S N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Asymmetrical ground impact of the hands after a trip-induced fall: experimental kinematics and kinetics.

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Age-related changes in protective arm reaction kinematics, kinetics, and neuromuscular activation during evoked forward falls.

Authors:  James Borrelli; Robert Creath; Kelly Westlake; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Test-retest reliability of the FALL FIT system for assessing and training protective arm reactions in response to a forward fall.

Authors:  James Borrelli; Robert Creath; Kelly Westlake; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2022-04-16

5.  Off-axis loads cause failure of the distal radius at lower magnitudes than axial loads: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Mark D Grabiner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Protective arm movements are modulated with fall height.

Authors:  James Borrelli; Robert Creath; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Does Fall Arrest Strategy Training Added to a Fall Prevention Programme Improve Balance, Strength, and Agility in Older Women? A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Cathy M Arnold; JoAnn Walker-Johnston; Joel L Lanovaz; Lauren J Lattimer
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Age and gender effects on the proximal propagation of an impulsive force along the adult human upper extremity.

Authors:  Yunju Lee; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.934

9.  Fall arrest strategy training improves upper body response time compared to standard fall prevention exercise in older women: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Catherine M Arnold; Joel Lanovaz; Jonathan P Farthing; Hayley Legg; Melanie Weimer; Soo Kim
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.884

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.