OBJECTIVE: (1) To assess the impact of high intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular volume and function. (2) To test the hypothesis that right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) represent cardiac preload and are superior to central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The validity of these parameters was tested by means of correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the true cardiac preload. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SUBJECTS: Fifteen adult sheep. INTERVENTIONS: All animals were studied before and after saline washout-induced lung injury, undergoing volume-controlled ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP (0, 7, 14 and 21 cmH2O, respectively). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (LVSV) and LVEDV were measured using computed tomography. ITBV and RVEDV were obtained by the thermal dye dilution technique. At PEEP 21 cmH2O, LVSV significantly decreased compared to baseline, PEEP 0 and PEEP 7 cmH2O. LVEDV was maintained except for the highest level of PEEP, while LVEF remained unchanged. RVEDV and RVEF also remained unchanged. The overall correlation of RVEDV and ITBV with LVEDV was satisfactory ( r=0.56 and r=0.62, respectively) and clearly superior to cardiac filling pressures. CONCLUSION: In the present study, (1) ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP did not alter RV function, while LV function was impaired at the highest level of PEEP; (2) unlike cardiac filling pressures, ITBV and RVEDV both provide valid estimates of cardiac preload even at high intrathoracic pressures.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To assess the impact of high intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular volume and function. (2) To test the hypothesis that right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) represent cardiac preload and are superior to central venous pressure (CVP) or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). The validity of these parameters was tested by means of correlation with left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), the true cardiac preload. DESIGN: Prospective animal study. SUBJECTS: Fifteen adult sheep. INTERVENTIONS: All animals were studied before and after saline washout-induced lung injury, undergoing volume-controlled ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP (0, 7, 14 and 21 cmH2O, respectively). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), stroke volume (LVSV) and LVEDV were measured using computed tomography. ITBV and RVEDV were obtained by the thermal dye dilution technique. At PEEP 21 cmH2O, LVSV significantly decreased compared to baseline, PEEP 0 and PEEP 7 cmH2O. LVEDV was maintained except for the highest level of PEEP, while LVEF remained unchanged. RVEDV and RVEF also remained unchanged. The overall correlation of RVEDV and ITBV with LVEDV was satisfactory ( r=0.56 and r=0.62, respectively) and clearly superior to cardiac filling pressures. CONCLUSION: In the present study, (1) ventilation with increasing levels of PEEP did not alter RV function, while LV function was impaired at the highest level of PEEP; (2) unlike cardiac filling pressures, ITBV and RVEDV both provide valid estimates of cardiac preload even at high intrathoracic pressures.
Authors: S Crotti; D Mascheroni; P Caironi; P Pelosi; G Ronzoni; M Mondino; J J Marini; L Gattinoni Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker; Benoit Vallet Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-02-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Shreyas Roy; Nader Habashi; Benjamin Sadowitz; Penny Andrews; Lin Ge; Guirong Wang; Preyas Roy; Auyon Ghosh; Michael Kuhn; Joshua Satalin; Louis A Gatto; Xin Lin; David A Dean; Yoram Vodovotz; Gary Nieman Journal: Shock Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Ednan K Bajwa; James L Januzzi; Michelle N Gong; B Taylor Thompson; David C Christiani Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kristine Waerhaug; Vsevolod V Kuzkov; Vladimir N Kuklin; Rica Mortensen; Kåre C Nordhus; Mikhail Y Kirov; Lars J Bjertnaes Journal: Crit Care Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Marc N Hirt; Nils A Sörensen; Lena M Bartholdt; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Sebastian Schaaf; Alexandra Eder; Ingra Vollert; Andrea Stöhr; Thomas Schulze; Anika Witten; Monika Stoll; Arne Hansen; Thomas Eschenhagen Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 17.165