Literature DB >> 12954959

Regional survey of temporary transvenous pacing procedures and complications.

T R Betts1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A prospective regional survey was carried out to describe the current practice of temporary transvenous pacing in five hospitals in the Wessex region and identify factors that predispose to complications.
METHODS: Data were collected on patient characteristics, pacing indication and setting, operator grade, training, experience and supervision, venous access, procedure time, duration of pacing, complications, and eventual outcome.
RESULTS: A total of 144 procedures were performed on 111 patients (age 75 (12) years). Median procedure time was 30 (1-150) min. Trainees performed 129 (91.5%) procedures. The senior physician present was a cardiologist/cardiology trainee for 65/144 (45.1%), and had experience of >20 procedures for 81/144 (57.9%). Venous access was by the subclavian in 52 (46.8%), internal jugular in 37 (33.3%) and femoral in 22 (19.8%), requiring multiple stabs or multiple sites in 41(33.1%). Pacing wires remained in place for a median of 2 (0.04-20) days. Overall procedure times were shorter for cardiologists/cardiology trainees (24[1-90] v 45[10-150] min, p<0.0001), and experienced physicians (30[1-150] v 40[10-120] min, p<0.01). There were 50 complications in 46/144 (31.9%) procedures, affecting 31/111 (27.9%) patients. Immediate complications were less common with experienced physicians (1/81 v 5/59, p<0.05). Infection occurred more often with wires left in situ for >48 hours (17/86 v 2/55, p<0.01) and with longer procedure times (55[8-150] v 30[1-120] min, p<0.005). No factors predicted displacement, which occurred at a median time of 1 (0.04-8) day. Complications delayed permanent pacemaker insertion in 19/63 (22.9%) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Temporary pacemaker insertion is performed by physicians with variable experience and training. The presence of an experienced cardiologist/cardiology trainee and decreasing the time that pacing wires remain in situ may reduce complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954959      PMCID: PMC1742799          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.934.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  3 in total

Review 1.  Temporary cardiac pacing.

Authors:  M D Gammage
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Current practice and complications of temporary transvenous cardiac pacing.

Authors:  J J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-04

3.  Experience and training in temporary transvenous pacing.

Authors:  G K Davis; D H Roberts
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct
  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  Thalidomide-induced symptomatic third-degree atrioventricular block.

Authors:  M Hinterseer; A Becker; S Kääb; N Lang; M Näbauer; G Steinbeck
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  A 9-year-old boy with severe diphtherial infection and cardiac complications.

Authors:  Charles Henry Washington; Satja Issaranggoon na ayuthaya; Krit Makonkawkeyoon; Peninnah Oberdorfer
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-11-20

3.  Subclavicular screwed wire transient pacing to increase safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve system.

Authors:  Thomas Cuisset; Jacques Quilici
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-04-06

4.  A review of temporary cardiac pacing wires.

Authors:  Peter McCann
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2007-01-01

5.  Temporary Transvenous Cardiac Pacing in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Predicts Increased Mortality.

Authors:  Yasir Yaqub; Alejandro Perez-Verdia; Leigh A Jenkins; Shermila Sehli; Robert L Paige; Kenneth M Nugent
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2012-01-20

Review 6.  A comprehensive scoping review on transvenous temporary pacing therapy.

Authors:  F V Y Tjong; U W de Ruijter; N E G Beurskens; R E Knops
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 7.  A Review of Temporary Permanent Pacemakers and a Comparison with Conventional Temporary Pacemakers.

Authors:  Keith Suarez; Javier E Banchs
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2019-05-15

8.  Feasibility of Leadless Cardiac Pacing Using Injectable Magnetic Microparticles.

Authors:  Menahem Y Rotenberg; Hovav Gabay; Yoram Etzion; Smadar Cohen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pacemaker Created in Human Ventricle by Depressing Inward-Rectifier K⁺ Current: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Kuanquan Wang; Qince Li; Henggui Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Is transjugular insertion of a temporary pacemaker a safe and effective approach?

Authors:  Kwang Jin Chun; Hye Bin Gwag; Jin Kyung Hwang; Seung-Jung Park; Young Keun On; June Soo Kim; Kyoung-Min Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.