Literature DB >> 12954423

Flavor preferences conditioned in C57BL/6 mice by intragastric carbohydrate self-infusion.

Anthony Sclafani1, John I Glendinning.   

Abstract

This study determined the feasibility of conditioning flavor preferences in mice by self-administered intragastric (IG) nutrient infusions. Male C57BL/6J mice were surgically fitted with an IG catheter that was attached by a tether system to an infusion pump. The mice were given ad-libitum access to chow and a flavored solution 23 h/day. Drinking was monitored with a computerized lickometer system that controlled the infusion pumps. In Experiment 1, drinking one flavored solution (CS+, e.g., grape-saccharin) was paired with matched infusions of 8% maltodextrin, whereas drinking another solution (CS-, e.g., cherry-saccharin) was matched with water infusions across 6 one-bottle training days. During training, the mice drank more CS+ than CS-; this was due to an increase in bout size but not bout frequency. In subsequent two-bottle choice tests, the mice strongly preferred (91%) the CS+ to the CS-. Experiment 2 obtained a significant but less robust (71%) CS+ preference in mice trained with unsweetened CS solutions. These data indicate that mice, like rats, acquire an increased acceptance and preference for flavors paired with the postingestive actions of nutrients. Our understanding of flavor-nutrient learning can be advanced by studying this process in selected mouse strains and genetically modified animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954423     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00174-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  30 in total

1.  Gut T1R3 sweet taste receptors do not mediate sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Damien S Glass; Robert F Margolskee; John I Glendinning
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  A conditioned aversion study of sucrose and SC45647 taste in TRPM5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Meghan C Eddy; Benjamin K Eschle; Darlene Peterson; Nathan Lauras; Robert F Margolskee; Eugene R Delay
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Intragastric self-infusion of ethanol in high- and low-drinking mouse genotypes after passive ethanol exposure.

Authors:  T L Fidler; A M Dion; M S Powers; J J Ramirez; J A Mulgrew; P J Smitasin; A T Crane; C L Cunningham
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.449

5.  Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-02-10

Review 6.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

7.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

8.  Intragastric fat self-administration is impaired in GPR40/120 double knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Khalid Touzani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-04-21

9.  Flavor change and food deprivation are not critical for post-oral glucose appetition in mice.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-04

10.  Residual chemosensory capabilities in double P2X2/P2X3 purinergic receptor null mice: intraoral or postingestive detection?

Authors:  Robert M Hallock; Marco Tatangelo; Jennell Barrows; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.160

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.