Literature DB >> 12954153

Microalbuminuria in diabetes mellitus: efficacy of a new screening method in comparison with timed overnight urine collection.

U Meinhardt1, R A Ammann, C Flück, P Diem, P E Mullis.   

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy and end-stage renal failure are still a major cause of mortality amongst patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). In this study, we evaluated the Clinitek-Microalbumin (CM) screening test strip for the detection of microalbuminuria (MA) in a random morning spot urine in comparison with the quantitative assessment of albuminuria in the timed overnight urine collection ("gold standard"). One hundred thirty-four children, adolescents, and young adults with insulin-dependent DM Type 1 were studied at 222 outpatient visits. Because of urinary tract infection and/or haematuria, the data of 13 visits were excluded. Finally, 165 timed overnight urine were collected in the remaining 209 visits (79% sample per visit rate). Ten (6.1%) patients presented MA of > or =15 microg/min. In comparison however, 200 spot urine could be screened (96% sample/visit rate) yielding a significant increase in compliance and screening rate (P<.001, McNemar test). Furthermore, at 156 occasions, the gold standard and CM could be directly compared. The sensitivity and the specificity for CM in the spot urine (cut-off > or =30 mg albumin/l) were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.99] and 0.73 (CI 0.66-0.80), respectively. The positive and negative predictive value were 0.17 (CI 0.08-0.30) and 0.99 (CI 0.95-1.00), respectively. Considering CM albumin-to-creatinine ratio, the results were poorer than with the albumin concentration alone. Using CM instead of quantitative assessment of albuminuria is not cost-effective (35 US dollars versus 60 US dollars/patient/year). In conclusion, to exclude MA, the CM used in the random spot urine is reliable and easy to handle, but positive screening results of > or =30 mg albumin/l must be confirmed by analyses in the timed overnight collected urine. Although the screening compliance is improved, in terms of analysing random morning spot urine for MA, we cannot recommend CM in a paediatric diabetic outpatient setting because the specificity is far too low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954153     DOI: 10.1016/s1056-8727(02)00180-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Complications        ISSN: 1056-8727            Impact factor:   2.852


  9 in total

1.  Diabetes-induced renal injury in rats is attenuated by suramin.

Authors:  Midhun C Korrapati; Brooke E Shaner; Benjamin A Neely; Joseph L Alge; John M Arthur; Rick G Schnellmann
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  David B Sacks; Mark Arnold; George L Bakris; David E Bruns; Andrea Rita Horvath; M Sue Kirkman; Ake Lernmark; Boyd E Metzger; David M Nathan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  An improved microalbumin method (microALB_2) with extended analytical measurement range evaluated on the ADVIA chemistry systems.

Authors:  Pradip Datta; Amitava Dasgupta
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Can a simple test of functional capacity add to the clinical assessment of diabetes?

Authors:  T Stewart; D G Caffrey; R H Gilman; S C Mathai; A Lerner; A Hernandez; M E Pinto; Y Huaylinos; L Cabrera; R A Wise; J J Miranda; W Checkley
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of semiquantitative point of care urine albumin to creatinine ratio and urine dipstick analysis in a primary care resource limited setting in South Africa.

Authors:  June Fabian; Jaya A George; Sean D Currin; Mwawi S Gondwe; Nokthula B Mayindi; Shingirai Chipungu; Bongekile L Khoza; Stephen Tollman
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  Measuring resource utilization in patient-oriented comparative effectiveness research: a psychometric study of the Resource Utilization Questionnaire.

Authors:  Arlene Smaldone; Argerie Tsimicalis; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 0.745

7.  Can a semi-quantitative method replace the current quantitative method for the annual screening of microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes? Diagnostic accuracy and cost-saving analysis considering the potential health burden.

Authors:  Yaerim Kim; Seokwoo Park; Myung-Hee Kim; Sang Hoon Song; Won Mok Lee; Hye Soon Kim; Kyubok Jin; Seungyeup Han; Yong Chul Kim; Seung Seok Han; Hajeong Lee; Jung Pyo Lee; Kwon Wook Joo; Chun Soo Lim; Yon Su Kim; Dong Ki Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Comparison of commonly used assays for the detection of microalbuminuria.

Authors:  Douglas E Busby; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Microalbuminuria in patients with chronic kidney disease at Parirenyatwa Hospital in Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Nyasha Chin'ombe; Ophius Msengezi; Hilda Matarira
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2013-01-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.