Literature DB >> 12950998

Analysing the optimal value for titanium implant roughness in bone attachment using a tensile test.

H J Rønold1, S P Lyngstadaas, J E Ellingsen.   

Abstract

This study aims at studying the effect of surface roughness on bone attachment of coin-shaped titanium implants. All implants in this study were blasted with TiO(2) particles of 180-220 microm, and then divided into three groups. One group had no further surface treatment whereas the other two groups were subsequently etched with hot hydrochloric acid (0.01M or 1M). The surface topography of the implant specimens was examined by SEM and by a confocal laser scanner for a numeric evaluation of S(a), S(t) and S(dr). The ranging implants in the three groups differed significantly in surface structure. The implants with modified surfaces were then placed into the tibias of 12 rabbits (n=16). After 8 weeks healing, the attachment of bone to implants were examined using a standardised tensile test analysis. The implants that were only blasted (positive control) showed significantly better functional attachment (p<0.001) than the acid etched. Implant surfaces etched with 1M HCl solution had the lowest retention in bone. There was a negative correlation between the increasing roughness and mechanical retention in bone of the implants in this study. The results support observations from earlier studies that suggested an optimal surface roughness for bone attachment, identified by in situ tensile tests and expressed as the arithmetic mean deviation (S(a)), to be in the range between 3.62 and 3.90 microm and that a further attachment depended on mechanical interlocking between bone and implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12950998     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00256-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  23 in total

1.  Nanomechanical evaluation of nickel-titanium surface properties after alkali and electrochemical treatments.

Authors:  Wojciech Chrzanowski; Ensanya Ali Abou Neel; David Andrew Armitage; Kevin Lee; Witold Walke; Jonathan Campbell Knowles
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface: an experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Mingdeng Rong; Lei Zhou; Zehong Gou; Andi Zhu; Dongfeng Zhou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  An improved mechanical testing method to assess bone-implant anchorage.

Authors:  Spencer Bell; Elnaz Ajami; John E Davies
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 1.355

5.  Electrodeposition of nanostructured bioactive hydroxyapatite-heparin composite coatings on titanium for dental implant applications.

Authors:  Benedetto Bozzini; Amilcare Barca; Francesco Bogani; Marco Boniardi; Paolo Carlino; Claudio Mele; Tiziano Verri; Alessandro Romano
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  On the Morphological Deviation in Additive Manufacturing of Porous Ti6Al4V Scaffold: A Design Consideration.

Authors:  Seyed Ataollah Naghavi; Haoyu Wang; Swastina Nath Varma; Maryam Tamaddon; Arsalan Marghoub; Rex Galbraith; Jane Galbraith; Mehran Moazen; Jia Hua; Wei Xu; Chaozong Liu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 3.748

7.  Mitigation of peri-implantitis by rational design of bifunctional peptides with antimicrobial properties.

Authors:  E Cate Wisdom; Yan Zhou; Casey Chen; Candan Tamerler; Malcolm L Snead
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2019-09-24

8.  Increased reactivity and in vitro cell response of titanium based implant surfaces after anodic oxidation.

Authors:  M S Walter; M J Frank; M F Sunding; M Gómez-Florit; M Monjo; M M Bucko; E Pamula; S P Lyngstadaas; H J Haugen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Effectiveness of a new dental implant bioactive surface: histological and histomorphometric comparative study in minipigs.

Authors:  Mariano Herrero-Climent; Manuel M Romero Ruizª; Pedro Lázaro Calvo; José Vicente Ríos Santos; Roman A Perez; Francisco Javier Gil Mur
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Mineralization of Titanium Surfaces: Biomimetic Implants.

Authors:  Javier Gil; Jose Maria Manero; Elisa Ruperez; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Alvaro Jiménez-Guerra; Iván Ortiz-García; Loreto Monsalve-Guil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.