Literature DB >> 12950582

Ocular, nasal, dermal and respiratory symptoms in relation to heating, ventilation, energy conservation, and reconstruction of older multi-family houses.

K Engvall1, C Norrby, D Norbäck.   

Abstract

The aim was to study relationships between symptoms compatible with the sick building syndrome, type of heating and ventilation system, energy saving, and reconstruction in older dwellings. In Stockholm, 4815 inhabitants in 231 multi-family buildings built before 1961 were randomly selected, of whom 3241 participated (77%). Symptoms and personal factors were assessed by a postal questionnaire. Independent information on building characteristics, and energy saving measures was gathered from the building owners. Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to calculate odds ratios (OR) adjusting for age, gender, hay fever, current smoking, population density, type of ventilation, type of heating system, and ownership of the building. Subjects in buildings with a mechanical ventilation system had less ocular and nasal symptoms (OR = 0.29-0.85). Heating by electric radiators, and wood heating was associated with an increase of most symptoms (OR = 1.18-1.74). In total, 48% lived in buildings that had gone through at least one type of reconstruction or energy saving remedies during the latest 10 years, including exchange of heating or ventilation system, and sealing measures (exchange of windows, sealing of window frames, roof/attic insulation, and phasade insulation). Energy saving was associated with both a decrease and increase of different symptoms. Major reconstruction of the interior of the building was associated with an increase of most symptoms (OR = 1.09-1.90), and buildings with more than one sealing measure had an increase of ocular, nasal symptoms, headache and tiredness (OR = 1.22-2.49). In conclusion, major reconstruction of the interior, direct heated electric radiators, wood heating, and multiple sealing of buildings were associated with an increase of some symptoms. The study supports the view that mechanical ventilation in dwellings is beneficial from a health point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12950582     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2003.00174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  6 in total

1.  Indoor environment in dwellings, asthma, allergies, and sick building syndrome in the Swedish population: a longitudinal cohort study from 1989 to 1997.

Authors:  B Sahlberg; Y-H Mi; D Norbäck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Rhinitis, asthma and respiratory infections among adults in relation to the home environment in multi-family buildings in Sweden.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Karin Engvall; Greta Smedje; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  SBS symptoms in relation to dampness and ventilation in inspected single-family houses in Sweden.

Authors:  Greta Smedje; Juan Wang; Dan Norbäck; Håkan Nilsson; Karin Engvall
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Clinical and allergological analysis of ocular manifestations of sick building syndrome.

Authors:  Yusuke Saeki; Kazuaki Kadonosono; Eiichi Uchio
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-14

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Associations between Energy Use, Fuel Poverty, Energy Efficiency Improvements and Health.

Authors:  Chengju Wang; Juan Wang; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Linking public health, housing, and indoor environmental policy: successes and challenges at local and federal agencies in the United States.

Authors:  David E Jacobs; Tom Kelly; John Sobolewski
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 9.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.