Literature DB >> 12949284

Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection regimens in children with type 1 diabetes: a randomized open crossover trial.

Naomi Weintrob1, Hadassa Benzaquen, Avinoam Galatzer, Shlomit Shalitin, Liora Lazar, Gila Fayman, Pearl Lilos, Zvi Dickerman, Moshe Phillip.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and feasibility of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) in children with type 1 diabetes.
METHODS: The study sample included 23 children (10 males) aged 9.4 to 13.9 years with type 1 diabetes. An open randomized crossover design was used to compare 3.5 months of CSII to 3.5 months of MDI therapy for the following variables: diabetic control, incidence of adverse events, daily insulin requirement, body mass index standard deviation scores, treatment satisfaction, and quality of life.
RESULTS: The changes in HbA(1c) and fructoseamine values were similar in the 2 arms over time. At the end of the study, mean HbA(1c) level measured 8.05 +/- 0.78%. There were no differences between the treatment modes in frequency of symptomatic hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic events. There was 1 event of severe hypoglycemia during pump therapy and 3 during MDI, yielding a rate of 0.26 events per patient-year. There were no episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis. Body mass index standard deviation scores decreased during CSII and increased during MDI, as did mean insulin dose. Patients expressed a higher treatment satisfaction from CSII than MDI, although there was no difference in quality of life between the 2 modes.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy by either insulin pump or MDI is safe in children and young adolescents with type 1 diabetes, with similar diabetes control and a very low rate of adverse events. We suggest that both modes be available to the diabetic team to better tailor therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949284     DOI: 10.1542/peds.112.3.559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  35 in total

1.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Authors:  Gillian H Toth
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Parental involvement buffers associations between pump duration and metabolic control among adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah J Wiebe; Andrea Croom; Katherine T Fortenberry; Jonathan Butner; Jorie Butler; Michael T Swinyard; Rob Lindsay; David Donaldson; Carol Foster; Mary Murray; Cynthia A Berg
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2010-03-10

Review 3.  Management of diabetes mellitus: is the pump mightier than the pen?

Authors:  John C Pickup
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  The evidence base for diabetes technology: appropriate and inappropriate meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C Pickup
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

Review 5.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in individuals with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Khalid Benkhadra; Fares Alahdab; Shrikant U Tamhane; Rozalina G McCoy; Larry J Prokop; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.633

6.  STAR 3 randomized controlled trial to compare sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy with multiple daily injections in the treatment of type 1 diabetes: research design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled subjects.

Authors:  Stephen N Davis; Edward S Horton; Tadej Battelino; Richard R Rubin; Kevin A Schulman; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 7.  Quality of life and technology: impact on children and families with diabetes.

Authors:  Masakazu Hirose; Elizabeth A Beverly; Katie Weinger
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.810

8.  Patient treatment satisfaction after switching to NovoMix® 30 (BIAsp 30) in the IMPROVE™ study: an analysis of the influence of prior and current treatment factors.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Paul Valensi; Joseph A Shaban; Don M Bushnell; Torsten L Christensen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-04       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Practical experience with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in a pediatric diabetes clinic.

Authors:  Michele A O'Connell; Fergus J Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01

10.  Long-term outcome of insulin pump therapy in children with type 1 diabetes assessed in a large population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Stephanie R Johnson; Matthew N Cooper; Timothy W Jones; Elizabeth A Davis
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.