OBJECTIVES: To examine pump duration associations with adolescents' metabolic control and whether parental involvement moderated this association. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional sample of 10- to 14-year-olds with diabetes (N = 252, 53.6% female) and parents' reported parental involvement; HbA1c was obtained from medical records. Half (50.8%) were on an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII), with the remainder prescribed multiple daily injections (MDI). RESULTS: Adolescents on CSII displayed better HbA1c than those on MDI. A curvilinear association revealed that participants on CSII for <2 years showed a positive pump duration-HbA1c association, while those on CSII longer showed no association. Parental involvement interacted with pump duration to predict HbA1c. Pump duration was associated with poorer HbA1c only when parents were relatively uninvolved. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of a cross-sectional design, data suggest that adolescents on CSII have better HbA1c than those on MDI, but may experience a period of deterioration that can be offset by parental involvement.
OBJECTIVES: To examine pump duration associations with adolescents' metabolic control and whether parental involvement moderated this association. METHODS: This study used a cross-sectional sample of 10- to 14-year-olds with diabetes (N = 252, 53.6% female) and parents' reported parental involvement; HbA1c was obtained from medical records. Half (50.8%) were on an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII), with the remainder prescribed multiple daily injections (MDI). RESULTS: Adolescents on CSII displayed better HbA1c than those on MDI. A curvilinear association revealed that participants on CSII for <2 years showed a positive pump duration-HbA1c association, while those on CSII longer showed no association. Parental involvement interacted with pump duration to predict HbA1c. Pump duration was associated with poorer HbA1c only when parents were relatively uninvolved. CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of a cross-sectional design, data suggest that adolescents on CSII have better HbA1c than those on MDI, but may experience a period of deterioration that can be offset by parental involvement.
Authors: Janet Silverstein; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Kenneth Copeland; Leslie Plotnick; Francine Kaufman; Lori Laffel; Larry Deeb; Margaret Grey; Barbara Anderson; Lea Ann Holzmeister; Nathaniel Clark Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jamie R Wood; Elaine C Moreland; Lisa K Volkening; Britta M Svoren; Deborah A Butler; Lori M B Laffel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Zeina M Nabhan; Laura Rardin; Jill Meier; Erica A Eugster; Linda A Dimeglio Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2006-05-15 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: T Danne; T Battelino; P Jarosz-Chobot; O Kordonouri; E Pánkowska; J Ludvigsson; E Schober; E Kaprio; T Saukkonen; M Nicolino; N Tubiana-Rufi; C Klinkert; H Haberland; A Vazeou; L Madacsy; D Zangen; V Cherubini; I Rabbone; S Toni; C de Beaufort; W Bakker-van Waarde; N van den Berg; I Volkov; R Barrio; R Hanas; U Zumsteg; B Kuhlmann; C Aebi; U Schumacher; S Gschwend; P Hindmarsh; M Torres; N Shehadeh; M Phillip Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Sara Rendell; Omofosolade Kosoko-Lasaki; Greg Penny; Cynthia T Cook; Apoorva Sharma; William P Austin; Marc Rendell Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2013-03-01
Authors: Elizabeth M Robinson; Patrick Weaver; Rusan Chen; Randi Streisand; Clarissa S Holmes Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 4.267