Literature DB >> 12949201

Troubles with the foreskin: one hundred consecutive referrals to paediatric surgeons.

J S Huntley1, M C Bourne, F D Munro, D Wilson-Storey.   

Abstract

To assess the reasons for and outcomes of referrals concerning the foreskin, 100 consecutive patients seen in paediatric clinics were followed to discharge. 18 referrals were for circumcision on religious grounds. Of the other 82, the main reason for referral was non-retractability or phimosis. At clinic, 24 (29%) of these were deemed normal for age, 31 (38%) were treated with topical steroid (successfully in 25), 9 (11%) were listed for preputioplasty, 7 (9%) were listed for adhesiolysis, 7 (9%) were listed for circumcision, and 4 were listed for other forms of surgery. 6 patients were identified as having balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO), a condition that had not been suggested on referral. With the advent of new treatments for foreskin disorders, circumcision is decreasingly necessary. Knowledge of the natural history of the foreskin, and the use of topical steroids, could shift the management of paediatric foreskin problems from the hospital outpatient department to primary care. BXO is not sufficiently recognized as a form of phimosis that requires operation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12949201      PMCID: PMC539600          DOI: 10.1177/014107680309600908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  8 in total

1.  Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice.

Authors:  A M Rickwood; S E Kenny; S C Donnell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-30

2.  The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision.

Authors:  D GAIRDNER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1949-12-24

3.  Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence?

Authors:  A M Rickwood; J Walker
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Management of foreskin problems.

Authors:  P M Lafferty; F B MacGregor; W G Scobie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.

Authors:  J Oster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Lateral preputioplasty for phimosis.

Authors:  T M Lane; L M South
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1999-10

7.  The treatment of childhood phimosis with topical steroid.

Authors:  J E Wright
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1994-05

8.  Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic.

Authors:  G A MacKinlay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-03
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Paediatric preputial pathology: are we circumcising enough?

Authors:  I E Yardley; C Cosgrove; A W Lambert
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Preputial adhesions--a misunderstood entity.

Authors:  Prasanna Kumar; Mainak Deb; Kanishka Das
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Emergency dorsal slit for balanitis with retention.

Authors:  N Thiruchelvam; P Nayak; H Mostafid
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 18.000

4.  Balanitis xerotica obliterans: has its diagnostic accuracy improved with time?

Authors:  Khalis Boksh; Nitin Patwardhan
Journal:  JRSM Open       Date:  2017-06-05

5.  Circumcision with the plastibell device in hooded prepuce or glanular hypospadias.

Authors:  Seyed A Mousavi; Hamid Mohammadjafari
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2009-10-26

Review 6.  Penile Inflammatory Skin Disorders and the Preventive Role of Circumcision.

Authors:  Brian J Morris; John N Krieger
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.