Literature DB >> 2802472

Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence?

A M Rickwood1, J Walker.   

Abstract

Thirty thousand circumcisions are performed annually in England and 70% of these are upon boys under 15 years of age. In the Mersey Region some 950 boys are circumcised each year for medical indications, the commonest being 'phimosis', which accounts for 87% of cases, of whom almost one-half are under 5 years of age. Regional practice is compared with that of our Unit, where the majority of referrals had developmentally non-retractile foreskin rather than true phimosis, where circumcisions for phimosis and for balanoposthitis occurred in almost equal numbers, and where no example of true phimosis was seen in boys under 5 years of age. It appears that in the Mersey Region many boys are circumcised for development non-retractability of the prepuce rather than for true phimosis and that in consequence some two-thirds of the operations are unnecessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2802472      PMCID: PMC2499015     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  5 in total

1.  The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision.

Authors:  D GAIRDNER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1949-12-24

2.  Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.

Authors:  J Oster
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1968-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Phimosis in boys.

Authors:  A M Rickwood; V Hemalatha; G Batcup; L Spitz
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1980-04

4.  Balanitis.

Authors:  J M Escala; A M Rickwood
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1989-02

5.  Save the prepuce. Painless separation of preputial adhesions in the outpatient clinic.

Authors:  G A MacKinlay
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-09-03
  5 in total
  20 in total

1.  Circumcision using bipolar diathermy scissors: a simple, safe and acceptable new technique.

Authors:  I D Fraser; J Tjoe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice.

Authors:  A M Rickwood; S E Kenny; S C Donnell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-30

3.  Impact of male circumcision on HIV risk compensation through the impediment of condom use in Botswana.

Authors:  N Ayiga; G Letamo
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Trends and attitudes towards paediatric circumcision in the South of Ireland.

Authors:  F O'Kelly; D M Fanning; S Elamin; E Kiely; C M Brady
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Circumcision : A Time to Rethink.

Authors:  H S Nagar; A Chauhan; V K Saxena
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

6.  A simple alternative to circumcision.

Authors:  M D Barber; W G Scobie
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 1.827

7.  Save the normal foreskin.

Authors:  A Gordon; J Collin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-02

8.  Why are children referred for circumcision?

Authors:  N Williams; J Chell; L Kapila
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-02

9.  Foreskin management: Survey of Canadian pediatric urologists.

Authors:  Peter D Metcalfe; Remon Elyas
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  What is the efficacy of circumcision in boys with complex urinary tract abnormalities?

Authors:  Mohammed Bader; Liam McCarthy
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.