BACKGROUND: The short and long term variability of the interrupter technique was assessed to determine whether interrupter resistance is a stable individual characteristic over time. The effect of field and standardised measurement conditions on the within-subject variability of the interrupter technique was also examined. METHODS: The interrupter technique was studied under field and standardised conditions in children aged 3-6 years. Under field conditions, five investigators performed the measurements using two different measurement devices in random sequence. Both short term (20-30 minutes) and long term variability (median 38 days) were assessed in 32 children. Under standardised conditions, a single investigator conducted all measurements using a single device; the repeated measurements were conducted at the same time of day in a familiar quiet classroom. Long term variability (median 11 days) was estimated in 15 children. Within-subject standard deviations were estimated by analysis of variance with adjustment for the effects of different investigators and measurement devices on within-subject variability under field conditions. RESULTS: Under field conditions within-subject standard deviations for short and long term variability were 0.10 kPa/l/s (adjusted 0.10 kPa/l/s) and 0.13 kPa/l/s (adjusted 0.14 kPa/l/s), respectively. Under standardised conditions the within-subject standard deviation for long term variability was 0.10 kPa/l/s. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of interrupter resistance under field conditions only slightly increased the within-subject variability compared with standardised conditions. The results indicate that interrupter resistance is a stable individual characteristic over a period of some weeks.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The short and long term variability of the interrupter technique was assessed to determine whether interrupter resistance is a stable individual characteristic over time. The effect of field and standardised measurement conditions on the within-subject variability of the interrupter technique was also examined. METHODS: The interrupter technique was studied under field and standardised conditions in children aged 3-6 years. Under field conditions, five investigators performed the measurements using two different measurement devices in random sequence. Both short term (20-30 minutes) and long term variability (median 38 days) were assessed in 32 children. Under standardised conditions, a single investigator conducted all measurements using a single device; the repeated measurements were conducted at the same time of day in a familiar quiet classroom. Long term variability (median 11 days) was estimated in 15 children. Within-subject standard deviations were estimated by analysis of variance with adjustment for the effects of different investigators and measurement devices on within-subject variability under field conditions. RESULTS: Under field conditions within-subject standard deviations for short and long term variability were 0.10 kPa/l/s (adjusted 0.10 kPa/l/s) and 0.13 kPa/l/s (adjusted 0.14 kPa/l/s), respectively. Under standardised conditions the within-subject standard deviation for long term variability was 0.10 kPa/l/s. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of interrupter resistance under field conditions only slightly increased the within-subject variability compared with standardised conditions. The results indicate that interrupter resistance is a stable individual characteristic over a period of some weeks.
Authors: A Wijga; H A Smit; B Brunekreef; J Gerritsen; M Kerkhof; L P Koopman; H J Neijens Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: E Lombardi; P D Sly; G Concutelli; E Novembre; G Veneruso; G Frongia; R Bernardini; A Vierucci Journal: Thorax Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Graham L Hall; Peter D Sly; Takayoshi Fukushima; Merci M Kusel; Peter J Franklin; Friedrich Horak; Hilary Patterson; Catherine Gangell; Stephen M Stick Journal: Thorax Date: 2007-01-24 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Rebekka Veugelers; Elsbeth A C Calis; Corine Penning; Arianne Verhagen; Roos Bernsen; Jan Bouquet; Marc A Benninga; Peter J F M Merkus; Hubertus G M Arets; Dick Tibboel; Heleen M Evenhuis Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2005-07-19 Impact factor: 2.125