Literature DB >> 12947062

Older age is an adverse prognostic factor in stage I, favorable histology Wilms' tumor treated with vincristine monochemotherapy: a study by the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group, Wilm's Tumor Working Group.

K Pritchard-Jones1, A Kelsey, G Vujanic, J Imeson, C Hutton, C Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify clinical prognostic factors in children with stage I, favorable histology (FH) Wilms' tumor treated with vincristine monochemotherapy after immediate nephrectomy to define subgroups for consideration of further reduction in treatment intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During two consecutive trials of the United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group (UKW2 and UKW3, 1986 to 2001), 242 children with stage I FH Wilms' tumor were treated with immediate nephrectomy followed by 10 weekly injections of vincristine 1.5 mg/m2. Event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by age group.
RESULTS: The 4-year EFS rate was 93.2%, 87.2%, and 71.3% for children less than 2 years old, 2 to 4 years old, and 4 years old or older at diagnosis, respectively (log-rank, P =.001); the corresponding 4-year OS rate was 98.1%, 95.0%, and 87.2% (log-rank, P =.01). There were no toxicity- or procedure-related deaths. In multivariate analysis, specimen weight was not of independent prognostic value (P =.66). Among the 186 children younger than 4 years at diagnosis, there were 17 relapses and five deaths, compared with 16 relapses and eight deaths among the 56 children at least 4 years old at diagnosis. OS after relapse was surprisingly poor (61.6% at 4 years).
CONCLUSION: Treatment for stage I FH Wilms' tumor is generally successful using vincristine monotherapy after immediate nephrectomy, and therefore, the risks of dactinomycin hepatopathy can be avoided. However, age at least 4 years is a significant adverse prognostic factor. This treatment schedule should be considered in any trial of treatment reduction in very young children with stage I FH Wilms' tumor, regardless of tumor size, and we suggest that the upper age limit for the reduced therapy be set at 4 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12947062     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

1.  Barriers to the enrollment of children in the Children's Oncology Group study of very low risk Wilms tumor: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Ning Li; Elizabeth A Mullen; Paul E Grundy; Elizabeth J Perman; Robert C Shamberger; Peter F Ehrlich; Jeffrey S Dome
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.289

Review 2.  Current management of wilms' tumor.

Authors:  Leah Nakamura; Michael Ritchey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  WT1 mutation and 11P15 loss of heterozygosity predict relapse in very low-risk wilms tumors treated with surgery alone: a children's oncology group study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Perlman; Paul E Grundy; James R Anderson; Lawrence J Jennings; Daniel M Green; Jeffrey S Dome; Robert C Shamberger; E Cristy Ruteshouser; Vicki Huff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Clinical Outcome and Biological Predictors of Relapse After Nephrectomy Only for Very Low-risk Wilms Tumor: A Report From Children's Oncology Group AREN0532.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth J Perlman; Elizabeth A Mullen; Yueh-Yun Chi; Thomas E Hamilton; Kenneth W Gow; Fernando A Ferrer; Douglas C Barnhart; Peter F Ehrlich; Geetika Khanna; John A Kalapurakal; Tina Bocking; Vicky Huff; Jing Tian; James I Geller; Paul E Grundy; James R Anderson; Jeffrey S Dome; Robert C Shamberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Management of Wilms' tumor: NWTS vs SIOP.

Authors:  Sushmita Bhatnagar
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2009-01

Review 6.  Wilms tumour: prognostic factors, staging, therapy and late effects.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste; Jeffrey S Dome; Paul S Babyn; Norbert M Graf; Paul Grundy; Jan Godzinski; Gill A Levitt; Helen Jenkinson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-11-17

7.  Hepatic metastasis at diagnosis in patients with Wilms tumor is not an independent adverse prognostic factor for stage IV Wilms tumor: a report from the Children's Oncology Group/National Wilms Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Peter F Ehrlich; Fernando A Ferrer; Michael L Ritchey; James R Anderson; Daniel M Green; Paul E Grundy; Jeffrey S Dome; John A Kalapurakal; Elizabeth J Perlman; Robert C Shamberger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  TP53 mutational status is a potential marker for risk stratification in Wilms tumour with diffuse anaplasia.

Authors:  Mariana Maschietto; Richard D Williams; Tasnim Chagtai; Sergey D Popov; Neil J Sebire; Gordan Vujanic; Elizabeth Perlman; James R Anderson; Paul Grundy; Jeffrey S Dome; Kathy Pritchard-Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Prognostic significance of age in 5631 patients with Wilms tumour prospectively registered in International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) 93-01 and 2001.

Authors:  J A Hol; M I Lopez-Yurda; H Van Tinteren; M Van Grotel; J Godzinski; G Vujanic; F Oldenburger; B De Camargo; G L Ramírez-Villar; C Bergeron; K Pritchard-Jones; N Graf; M M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Wilms' tumour: Determinants of prognosis in an African setting.

Authors:  Akinfenwa Taoheed Atanda; Lofty-John Chuhwuemeka Anyanwu; Oladoyin Jareenat Atanda; Aminu Mohammad Mohammad; Lawal Barau Abdullahi; Aliyu Umar Farinyaro
Journal:  Afr J Paediatr Surg       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.