Literature DB >> 12946916

A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales.

Steven P Reise1, James M Henson.   

Abstract

Item response theory (IRT) methods are used by large testing firms, state agencies, and school districts to construct, analyze, and score most major aptitude, achievement, proficiency, entrance, and professional licensure exams. Personality assessment, in contrast, has not generally adopted these more powerful, modern psychometric techniques. We evaluate the possible role of IRT in the personality domain by highlighting key areas in which IRT and traditional methods differ. Although we conclude that IRT has a significant role to play in future personality measurement, there are many systemic and technical barriers to its routine application.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946916     DOI: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8102_01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Assess        ISSN: 0022-3891


  28 in total

1.  Health literacy assessment using talking touchscreen technology (Health LiTT): a new item response theory-based measure of health literacy.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hahn; Seung W Choi; James W Griffith; Kathleen J Yost; David W Baker
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011

2.  Item response theory analysis of intimate-partner violence in a community sample.

Authors:  Anita Jose; Thomas M Olino; K Daniel O'Leary
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  A Study of Reverse-Worded Matched Item Pairs Using the Generalized Partial Credit and Nominal Response Models.

Authors:  Ki Lynn Matlock; Ronna C Turner; W Dent Gitchel
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.821

4.  Applying the Nominal Response Model Within a Longitudinal Framework to Construct the Positive Family Relationships Scale.

Authors:  Kathleen Suzanne Johnson Preston; Skye N Parral; Allen W Gottfried; Pamella H Oliver; Adele Eskeles Gottfried; Sirena M Ibrahim; Danielle Delany
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory.

Authors:  Michael Hennessy; Amy Bleakley; Martin Fishbein
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2012-03

6.  An item response theory analysis of the Prodromal Questionnaire-Brief Child Version: Developing a screening form that informs understanding of self-reported psychotic-like experiences in childhood.

Authors:  Nicole R Karcher; Michael T Perino; Deanna M Barch
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2020-02-27

7.  Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  R Cordier; A Joosten; P Clavé; A Schindler; M Bülow; N Demir; S Serel Arslan; R Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Comparing cannabis use motive item performance between American Indian and White youth.

Authors:  Samuel R Davis; Mark A Prince; Randall C Swaim; Linda R Stanley
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Psychometric Characteristics of Non-instrumental Swallowing and Feeding Assessments in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN.

Authors:  Renée Speyer; Reinie Cordier; Lauren Parsons; Deborah Denman; Jae-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  Development of the NIH PROMIS ® Sexual Function and Satisfaction measures in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn E Flynn; Li Lin; Jill M Cyranowski; Bryce B Reeve; Jennifer Barsky Reese; Diana D Jeffery; Ashley Wilder Smith; Laura S Porter; Carrie B Dombeck; Deborah Watkins Bruner; Francis J Keefe; Kevin P Weinfurt
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.