Literature DB >> 12946686

Choral speech: the amelioration of stuttering via imitation and the mirror neuronal system.

Joseph Kalinowski1, Tim Saltuklaroglu.   

Abstract

'Choral' speech or speaking in unison is an undeniable phenomenon that immediately induces fluent and natural sounding speech in almost all people who stutter, regardless of linguistic content, situation or audience size. We propose that the choral speech effect is a form direct imitation, a primitive and innate human capacity that is possibly mediated at the neuronal level by 'mirror neurons'. Mirror systems link observations and actions are considered by many to be a neuronal substrate for gestural language acquisition, as well as forming the basis for many learned behaviors, thus possibly playing a vital role in ensuring survival during infancy. The engagement of these systems allows gestural sequences, including speech, to be fluently replicated. Choral speech and its permutations use the capacity for fluent imitation in people who stutter via a 'loose' gestural matching system in which gestures in the external signal possessing cues found in the intended utterance can serve as stuttering inhibitors. We suggest implementing these innate gestural mirrors to provide immediate and effective amelioration for stuttering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946686     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(03)00063-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  13 in total

1.  Dramatic effects of speech task on motor and linguistic planning in severely dysfluent parkinsonian speech.

Authors:  Diana Van Lancker Sidtis; Krista Cameron; John J Sidtis
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Overreliance on auditory feedback may lead to sound/syllable repetitions: simulations of stuttering and fluency-inducing conditions with a neural model of speech production.

Authors:  Oren Civier; Stephen M Tasko; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.538

3.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 4.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Periodic and aperiodic synchronization in skilled action.

Authors:  Fred Cummins
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Morphological brain differences between adult stutterers and non-stutterers.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Jürgen Hänggi; Helmuth Steinmetz
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 7.  A review of brain circuitries involved in stuttering.

Authors:  Anna Craig-McQuaide; Harith Akram; Ludvic Zrinzo; Elina Tripoliti
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study.

Authors:  Tiffani Kittilstved; Kevin J Reilly; Ashley W Harkrider; Devin Casenhiser; David Thornton; David E Jenson; Tricia Hedinger; Andrew L Bowers; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Structural and functional abnormalities of the motor system in developmental stuttering.

Authors:  Kate E Watkins; Stephen M Smith; Steve Davis; Peter Howell
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  The shadow of a doubt? Evidence for perceptuo-motor linkage during auditory and audiovisual close-shadowing.

Authors:  Lucie Scarbel; Denis Beautemps; Jean-Luc Schwartz; Marc Sato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.