Literature DB >> 12946624

The cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks: defining the sensors and mediators.

John H J Petrini1, Travis H Stracker.   

Abstract

The induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) culminates in the activation of cell cycle checkpoint responses and DNA repair machinery. The mechanism of DSB detection remains unclear although many candidate sensor proteins have been identified through cytologic, biochemical and genetic studies. In light of recent advances in our understanding of the cellular response to DSBs, we have proposed criteria for defining sensor proteins. We discuss the possible role of the Mre11 complex as a primary damage sensor and the complex relationship between DNA damage sensors, transducers and mediators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12946624     DOI: 10.1016/s0962-8924(03)00170-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cell Biol        ISSN: 0962-8924            Impact factor:   20.808


  119 in total

1.  BMI1-mediated histone ubiquitylation promotes DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Ismail Hassan Ismail; Christi Andrin; Darin McDonald; Michael J Hendzel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 10.539

2.  Serotype-specific inactivation of the cellular DNA damage response during adenovirus infection.

Authors:  Natalie A Forrester; Garry G Sedgwick; Anoushka Thomas; Andrew N Blackford; Thomas Speiseder; Thomas Dobner; Philip J Byrd; Grant S Stewart; Andrew S Turnell; Roger J A Grand
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  MCL-1 localizes to sites of DNA damage and regulates DNA damage response.

Authors:  Sarwat Jamil; Cezar Stoica; Tillie-Louise Hackett; Vincent Duronio
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Transcription-associated breaks in xeroderma pigmentosum group D cells from patients with combined features of xeroderma pigmentosum and Cockayne syndrome.

Authors:  Therina Theron; Maria I Fousteri; Marcel Volker; Lorna W Harries; Elena Botta; Miria Stefanini; Mitsuo Fujimoto; Jaan-Olle Andressoo; Jay Mitchell; Nicolaas G J Jaspers; Lisa D McDaniel; Leon H Mullenders; Alan R Lehmann
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  ATM activation and its recruitment to damaged DNA require binding to the C terminus of Nbs1.

Authors:  Zhongsheng You; Charly Chahwan; Julie Bailis; Tony Hunter; Paul Russell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Imaging of protein movement induced by chromosomal breakage: tiny 'local' lesions pose great 'global' challenges.

Authors:  Claudia Lukas; Jiri Bartek; Jiri Lukas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by yKu70-yKu80 heterodimer through DNA damage checkpoints.

Authors:  Soma Banerjee; Stephanie Smith; Kyungjae Myung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Serotype-specific restriction of wild-type adenoviruses by the cellular Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex.

Authors:  Neha J Pancholi; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 9.  DNA strand breaks, neurodegeneration and aging in the brain.

Authors:  Sachin Katyal; Peter J McKinnon
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 5.432

10.  Differential requirements of the C terminus of Nbs1 in suppressing adenovirus DNA replication and promoting concatemer formation.

Authors:  Seema S Lakdawala; Rachel A Schwartz; Kevin Ferenchak; Christian T Carson; Brian P McSharry; Gavin W Wilkinson; Matthew D Weitzman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.