Literature DB >> 12944469

Recognizing chromosomes in trouble: association of the spindle checkpoint protein Bub3p with altered kinetochores and a unique defective centromere.

Oliver Kerscher1, Luciana B Crotti, Munira A Basrai.   

Abstract

Spindle checkpoint proteins monitor the interaction of the spindle apparatus with the kinetochores, halting anaphase even if the microtubule attachment of only a single chromosome is altered. In this study, we show that Bub3p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an evolutionarily conserved spindle checkpoint protein, exhibits distinct interactions with an altered or defective kinetochore(s). We show for the first time that green fluorescent protein-tagged S. cerevisiae Bub3p (Bub3-GFP) exhibits not only a diffuse nuclear localization pattern but also forms distinct nuclear foci in unperturbed growing and G(2)/M-arrested cells. As Bub3-GFP foci overlap only a subset of kinetochores, we tested a model in which alterations or defects in kinetochore or spindle integrity lead to the distinct enrichment of Bub3p at these structures. In support of our model, kinetochore-associated Bub3-GFP is enriched upon activation of the spindle checkpoint due to nocodazole-induced spindle disassembly, overexpression of the checkpoint kinase Mps1p, or the presence of a defective centromere (CEN). Most importantly, using a novel approach with the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) technique and genetically engineered defective CEN [CF/CEN6(Delta31)], we determined that Bub3-GFP can associate with a single defective kinetochore. Our studies represent the first comprehensive molecular analysis of spindle checkpoint protein function in the context of a wild-type or defective kinetochore(s) by use of live-cell imaging and the ChIP technique in S. cerevisiae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12944469      PMCID: PMC193694          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6406-6418.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  53 in total

1.  Bub1p kinase activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  K A Farr; M A Hoyt
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Cell cycle arrest in cdc20 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is independent of Ndc10p and kinetochore function but requires a subset of spindle checkpoint genes.

Authors:  P A Tavormina; D J Burke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Requirement of chromatid cohesion proteins rad21/scc1 and mis4/scc2 for normal spindle-kinetochore interaction in fission yeast.

Authors:  Yusuke Toyoda; Kanji Furuya; Gohta Goshima; Koji Nagao; Kohta Takahashi; Mitsuhiro Yanagida
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2002-03-05       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Budding yeast centromere composition and assembly as revealed by in vivo cross-linking.

Authors:  P B Meluh; D Koshland
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers.

Authors:  D P Cahill; C Lengauer; J Yu; G J Riggins; J K Willson; S D Markowitz; K W Kinzler; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2.

Authors:  Y Li; R Benezra
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast.

Authors:  R Ciosk; W Zachariae; C Michaelis; A Shevchenko; M Mann; K Nasmyth
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-06-12       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Analysis of the Saccharomyces spindle pole by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry.

Authors:  P A Wigge; O N Jensen; S Holmes; S Souès; M Mann; J V Kilmartin
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-05-18       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase.

Authors:  S S Taylor; E Ha; F McKeon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-07-13       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores.

Authors:  R H Chen; A Shevchenko; M Mann; A W Murray
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1998-10-19       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  15 in total

1.  Structural analysis of Bub3 interactions in the mitotic spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Nicholas A Larsen; Jawdat Al-Bassam; Ronnie R Wei; Stephen C Harrison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mimicking Ndc80 phosphorylation triggers spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Stefan Kemmler; Manuel Stach; Maria Knapp; Jennifer Ortiz; Jens Pfannstiel; Thomas Ruppert; Johannes Lechner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Novel mad2 alleles isolated in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe gamma-tubulin mutant are defective in metaphase arrest activity, but remain functional for chromosome stability in unperturbed mitosis.

Authors:  Yoshie Tange; Osami Niwa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Interactions between Mad1p and the nuclear transport machinery in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Robert J Scott; C Patrick Lusk; David J Dilworth; John D Aitchison; Richard W Wozniak
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.138

5.  The C-terminal half of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mad1p mediates spindle checkpoint function, chromosome transmission fidelity and CEN association.

Authors:  James P Kastenmayer; Marina S Lee; Andrew L Hong; Forrest A Spencer; Munira A Basrai
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores.

Authors:  Nitobe London; Steven Ceto; Jeffrey A Ranish; Sue Biggins
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3.

Authors:  Marina S Lee; Forrest A Spencer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase subunit Slx5 resides in nuclear foci and at sites of DNA breaks.

Authors:  Caitlin E Cook; Mark Hochstrasser; Oliver Kerscher
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Changes in the localization of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaphase-promoting complex upon microtubule depolymerization and spindle checkpoint activation.

Authors:  Patricia G Melloy; Sandra L Holloway
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Andreas Doncic; Eshel Ben-Jacob; Shmuel Einav; Naama Barkai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.