Literature DB >> 12944332

Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia.

Pekka Tienari1, Lyman C Wynne, Kristian Läksy, Juha Moring, Pentti Nieminen, Anneli Sorri, Ilpo Lahti, Karl-Erik Wahlberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Identification of the genetically related disorders in the putative schizophrenia spectrum is an unresolved problem. Data from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia, which was designed to disentangle genetic and environmental factors influencing risk for schizophrenia, were used to examine clinical phenotypes of schizophrenia spectrum disorders in adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.
METHOD: Subjects were 190 adoptees at broadly defined genetic high risk who had biological mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, including a subgroup of 137 adoptees at narrowly defined high risk whose mothers had DSM-III-R schizophrenia. These high-risk groups, followed to a median age of 44 years, were compared diagnostically with 192 low-risk adoptees whose biological mothers had either a non-schizophrenia-spectrum diagnosis or no lifetime psychiatric diagnosis.
RESULTS: In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia, the mean lifetime, age-corrected morbid risk for narrowly defined schizophrenia was 5.34% (SE=1.97%), compared to 1.74% (SE=1.00%) for low-risk adoptees, a marginally nonsignificant difference. In adoptees whose mothers had schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the mean age-corrected morbid risk for a schizophrenia spectrum disorder was 22.46% (SE=3.56%), compared with 4.36% (SE=1.51%) for low-risk adoptees, a significant difference. Within the comprehensive array of schizophrenia spectrum disorders, schizotypal personality disorder was found significantly more often in high-risk than in low-risk adoptees. The frequency of the group of nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses collectively differentiated high-risk and low-risk adoptees, but the frequencies of the separate disorders within this category did not. The two groups were not differentiated by the prevalence of paranoid personality disorder and of affective disorders with psychotic features.
CONCLUSIONS: In adopted-away offspring of mothers with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, the genetic liability for schizophrenia-related illness (with the rearing contributions of the biological mothers disentangled) is broadly dispersed. Genetically oriented studies of schizophrenia-related disorders and studies of genotype-environment interaction should consider not only narrowly defined, typical schizophrenia but also schizotypal and schizoid personality disorders and nonschizophrenic nonaffective psychoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12944332     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.9.1587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  32 in total

1.  Evidence from structural and diffusion tensor imaging for frontotemporal deficits in psychometric schizotypy.

Authors:  Pamela DeRosse; George C Nitzburg; Toshikazu Ikuta; Bart D Peters; Anil K Malhotra; Philip R Szeszko
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 2.  Approaches for adolescents with an affected family member with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Vaibhav A Diwadkar; Konasale M Prasad; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Predicting the longitudinal effects of the family environment on prodromal symptoms and functioning in patients at-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Danielle A Schlosser; Jamie L Zinberg; Rachel L Loewy; Shannon Casey-Cannon; Mary P O'Brien; Carrie E Bearden; Sophia Vinogradov; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Service Profile of Youths with Schizophrenia-Spectrum Diagnoses.

Authors:  Jason Schiffman; Bruce F Chorpita; Eric L Daleiden; Justin A Maeda; Brad J Nakamura
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2008-04

5.  Specificity of familial transmission of schizophrenia psychosis spectrum and affective psychoses in the New England family study's high-risk design.

Authors:  Jill M Goldstein; Stephen L Buka; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-05

6.  Opposite risk patterns for autism and schizophrenia are associated with normal variation in birth size: phenotypic support for hypothesized diametric gene-dosage effects.

Authors:  Sean G Byars; Stephen C Stearns; Jacobus J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  New Genetic Findings in Schizophrenia: Is there Still Room for the Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia?

Authors:  Vanessa Nieratschker; Markus M Nöthen; Marcella Rietschel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Tailoring the definition of the clinical schizophrenia phenotype in linkage studies.

Authors:  Verena Krause; Olga Krastoshevsky; Michael J Coleman; J Alexander Bodkin; Jan Lerbinger; Lenore Boling; Fred Johnson; Anne Gibbs; Jonathan O Cole; Zhuying Huang; Nancy R Mendell; Deborah L Levy
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  The structure of genetic and environmental risk factors for DSM-IV personality disorders: a multivariate twin study.

Authors:  Kenneth S Kendler; Steven H Aggen; Nikolai Czajkowski; Espen Røysamb; Kristian Tambs; Svenn Torgersen; Michael C Neale; Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12

Review 10.  Developmental precursors of psychosis.

Authors:  Matti Isohanni; Irene Isohanni; Hannu Koponen; Johanna Koskinen; Pekka Laine; Erika Lauronen; Jouko Miettunen; Pirjo Mäki; Kaisa Riala; Sami Räsänen; Kaisa Saari; Pekka Tienari; Juha Veijola; Graham Murray
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.