Literature DB >> 12943948

Decision-making strategies by panic disorder subjects are more sensitive to errors.

Stephan Ludewig1, Martin P Paulus, Katja Ludewig, Franz X Vollenweider.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decision-making is a complex process, which can be assessed experimentally by the two-choice prediction task. Error-rate, i.e. the frequency of incorrect predictions during this task, is an important factor for the response selection during decision-making. This investigation examined whether the frequency of incorrect predictions has an augmented effect on the number of different strategies underlying decision-making in patients with panic disorder.
METHODS: Patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of panic disorder (PD; N=18), unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD; N=18) and normal comparison subjects (C; N=35) were tested with the two-choice prediction task using three error-rate conditions (20, 50, or 80%). The dynamical entropy of the response sequences was used to quantify the number of different strategies generated during the different error-rates.
RESULTS: At 20% error-rates, panic disorder subjects when compared to MDD and C subjects generated more strategies and switched more frequently between strategies as measured by the dynamical entropy and the range of local dynamical entropies. Response bias measures during the two-choice prediction task and post-test self-assessment did not differ between panic disorder subjects and MDD or C subjects. LIMITATIONS: First, panic disorder subjects were medicated. Second, the frequency and intensity of panic attacks and the degree of avoidance behaviors, was not assessed. Third, subjects were tested once only.
CONCLUSIONS: Panic disorder subjects show uniformly high response sequence unpredictability in the presence of low error-rates, which is consistent with continued search for an optimal response strategy even when the error-rate is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943948     DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00089-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  7 in total

1.  Functional network dysfunction in anxiety and anxiety disorders.

Authors:  C M Sylvester; M Corbetta; M E Raichle; T L Rodebaugh; B L Schlaggar; Y I Sheline; C F Zorumski; E J Lenze
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Neuroeconomic approaches to mental disorders.

Authors:  Kenneth T Kishida; Brooks King-Casas; P Read Montague
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 3.  Neural systems underlying approach and avoidance in anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Robin L Aupperle; Martin P Paulus
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.986

4.  Cognitive Control Functions in Unipolar Major Depression with and without Co-Morbid Anxiety Disorder.

Authors:  Pia Lyche; Rune Jonassen; Tore C Stiles; Pål Ulleberg; Nils I Landrø
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Enhanced cardiac perception predicts impaired performance in the Iowa Gambling Task in patients with panic disorder.

Authors:  Julian Wölk; Stefan Sütterlin; Stefan Koch; Claus Vögele; Stefan M Schulz
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.708

6.  The Self and its World: A Neuro-Ecological and Temporo-Spatial Account of Existential Fear.

Authors:  Andrea Scalabrini; Clara Mucci; Lorenzo Lucherini Angeletti; Georg Northoff
Journal:  Clin Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2020-04

7.  Impairment of Working Memory, Decision-making, and Executive Function in the First-Degree Relatives of People with Panic Disorder: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Zhenhe Zhou; Dongjie Ni
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.157

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.