Literature DB >> 12943538

The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part I. Overview of current status and regulations.

Jan-Peter Nap1, Peter L J Metz, Marga Escaler, Anthony J Conner.   

Abstract

In the past 6 years, the global area of commercially grown, genetically modified (GM) crops has increased more than 30-fold to over 52 million hectares. The number of countries involved has more than doubled. Especially in developing countries, the GM crop area is anticipated to increase rapidly in the coming years. Despite this high adoption rate and future promises, there is a multitude of concerns about the impact of GM crops on the environment. Regulatory approaches in Europe and North America are essentially different. In the EU, it is based on the process of making GM crops; in the US, on the characteristics of the GM product. Many other countries are in the process of establishing regulation based on either system or a mixture. Despite these differences, the information required for risk assessment tends to be similar. Each risk assessment considers the possibility, probability and consequence of harm on a case-by-case basis. For GM crops, the impact of non-use should be added to this evaluation. It is important that the regulation of risk should not turn into the risk of regulation. The best and most appropriate baseline for comparison when performing risk assessment on GM crops is the impact of plants developed by traditional breeding. The latter is an integral and accepted part of agriculture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943538     DOI: 10.1046/j.0960-7412.2003.01602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant J        ISSN: 0960-7412            Impact factor:   6.417


  17 in total

Review 1.  Risk mitigation of genetically modified bacteria and plants designed for bioremediation.

Authors:  John Davison
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Farmer knowledge and a priori risk analysis: pre-release evaluation of genetically modified Roundup Ready wheat across the Canadian prairies.

Authors:  Ian J Mauro; Stéphane M McLachlan; Rene C Van Acker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Knowledge, attitudes and behavioral intentions of agricultural professionals toward genetically modified (GM) foods: a case study in Southwest Iran.

Authors:  Sedigheh Ghasemi; Ezatollah Karami; Hossein Azadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Selectable antibiotic resistance marker gene-free transgenic rice harbouring the garlic leaf lectin gene exhibits resistance to sap-sucking planthoppers.

Authors:  Subhadipa Sengupta; Dipankar Chakraborti; Hossain A Mondal; Sampa Das
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.570

5.  Metabolism of zearalenone by genetically modified organisms expressing the detoxification gene from Clonostachys rosea.

Authors:  Naoko Takahashi-Ando; Shuichi Ohsato; Takehiko Shibata; Hiroshi Hamamoto; Isamu Yamaguchi; Makoto Kimura
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Field trials to evaluate the effects of transgenic cry1Ie maize on the community characteristics of arthropod natural enemies.

Authors:  Jingfei Guo; Kanglai He; Richard L Hellmich; Shuxiong Bai; Tiantao Zhang; Yunjun Liu; Tofael Ahmed; Zhenying Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic perennial creeping bentgrass and hybridization at the landscape level.

Authors:  María Luz Zapiola; Carol Ann Mallory-Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: two different scientific points of view.

Authors:  M Buiatti; P Christou; G Pastore
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.523

9.  Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic cotton under greenhouse conditions is dependent on different pollinators.

Authors:  Shuo Yan; Jialin Zhu; Weilong Zhu; Zhen Li; Anthony M Shelton; Junyu Luo; Jinjie Cui; Qingwen Zhang; Xiaoxia Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Silencing of the sulfur rich α-gliadin storage protein family in wheat grains (Triticum aestivum L.) causes no unintended side-effects on other metabolites.

Authors:  Christian Zörb; Dirk Becker; Mario Hasler; Karl H Mühling; Victoria Gödde; Karsten Niehaus; Christoph-Martin Geilfus
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.