Literature DB >> 12943287

Alignment in total knee arthroplasty following failed high tibial osteotomy.

Tsutomu Kawano1, Hiromasa Miura, Ryuji Nagamine, Ken Urabe, Shuichi Matsuda, Taro Mawatari, Takaaki Moro-Oka, Yukihide Iwamoto.   

Abstract

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following failed high tibial osteotomy, the mechanical axis does not intersect the center of the tibial component if the tibia has been resected perpendicular to the anatomical axis. Therefore, tibial resection referencing the predicted postoperative mechanical axis instead of the tibial shaft axis is advocated. To obtain the optimal tibial resection, characteristics of the tibial proximal deformity were measured radiographically and predicted postoperative lower limb alignment was calculated using full-length, weight-bearing, lower limb anteroposterior radiographs. Two finite element analysis models also were examined. The proximal tibia was resected perpendicular to the tibial shaft axis in model 1, and perpendicular to the predicted postoperative tibial mechanical axis in model 2. When the proximal tibia was resected perpendicular to the tibial shaft axis, the predicted lower limb mechanical axis was significantly shifted medially to the center of the tibial joint surface. The results of the finite element analysis reflected the medial shift of the lower limb mechanical axis in model 1, where stresses were increased in the medial tibial compartment. Tibial resection referencing the predicted postoperative tibial mechanical axis, instead of the tibial shaft axis, should be performed, especially in cases with a deformed tibia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12943287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  5 in total

1.  Stem length in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anay Rajendra Patel; Brian Barlow; Amar S Ranawat
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review of open versus closed wedge osteotomy.

Authors:  Jae Hwi Han; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Nikhl N Bhandare; Dong Won Suh; Jong Seong Lee; Yong Suk Chang; Ji Woong Yeom; Kyung Wook Nha
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Total knee arthroplasty following failed high tibial osteotomy: mid-term comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized prosthesis.

Authors:  Yukio Akasaki; Shuichi Matsuda; Hiromasa Miura; Ken Okazaki; Taka-aki Moro-oka; Hideki Mizu-uchi; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Comparison of the impact of closing wedge versus opening wedge high tibial osteotomy on proximal tibial deformity and subsequent revision to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Umito Kuwashima; Yasutaka Tashiro; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Satoshi Hamai; Koji Murakami; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Cruciate retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty after previous high tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  Jerry Yongqiang Chen; Ngai Nung Lo; Hwei Chi Chong; Hee Nee Pang; Darren Keng Jin Tay; Pak Lin Chin; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-31       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.