Literature DB >> 12942344

Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture or mesh.

L A Israelsson1, L Jönsson, A Wimo.   

Abstract

The objective was to make a cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture repair or prosthetic mesh repair. The study included 44 patients who underwent hernia repair between 1991 and 2000. The rate of recurrent incisional hernia after more than 1 year with associated costs was registered. In 1996, the technique of incisional hernia repair was changed from suture repair to mesh repair. With a mesh repair, zero out of 19 patients presented with a recurrence at follow-up, and with suture repair, five out of 13 had a recurrence (P<0.01). The duration of anaesthetic and operation was longer, but stay in the surgical ward, and sick leave was shorter for patients with a mesh repair than for those with a suture repair. For working patients, costs in the operating theatre were 4,095 Swedish kronor (SEK) higher with a mesh repair, and the costs for surgical ward, sick leave, and examination were 10,129 SEK lower than with a suture repair. Thus, with a mesh repair, the total costs were 6,034 SEK lower than with a suture repair. For retired patients, the total costs with a mesh repair were 1,898 SEK lower than with a suture repair. We conclude that in this setting, mesh repair of incisional hernias produced lower costs than suture repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942344     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-003-0119-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  18 in total

Review 1.  The treatment of complicated groin and incisional hernias.

Authors:  R E Stoppa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  T Anthony; P C Bergen; L T Kim; M Henderson; T Fahey; R V Rege; R H Turnage
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias.

Authors:  G E Leber; J L Garb; A I Alexander; W P Reed
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-04

Review 4.  Abdominal incisions and their closure.

Authors:  H Ellis; T E Bucknall; P J Cox
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Long-term results after surgical correction of incisional hernia.

Authors:  F T van der Linden; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Neth J Surg       Date:  1988-10

6.  Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; T Jonsson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.

Authors:  P C Richards; C M Balch; J S Aldrete
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A comparison of upper abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.

Authors:  A R Askew
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1983-08

9.  Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  L A Israelsson; T Jonsson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1996-02

10.  Surgical outcome and hospital cost analyses of laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair.

Authors:  E A Papachristou; M F Mitselou; N D Finokaliotis
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.739

View more
  10 in total

1.  Open versus endoscopic component separation: a cost comparison.

Authors:  Karem C Harth; Johnie Rose; Conor P Delaney; Jeffrey A Blatnik; Ihab Halaweish; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair with synthetic mesh and biological mesh: an Italian study.

Authors:  Sabrina Rampado; Andrea Geron; Giovanni Pirozzolo; Angelica Ganss; Elisa Pizzolato; Romeo Bardini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

3.  Cost analysis of the use of small stitches when closing midline abdominal incisions.

Authors:  D Millbourn; A Wimo; L A Israelsson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Aslani; C J Brown
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Open suture versus mesh repair of primary incisional hernias: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  K R Finan; M L Kilgore; M T Hawn
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Financial implications of ventral hernia repair: a hospital cost analysis.

Authors:  Drew Reynolds; Daniel L Davenport; Ryan L Korosec; J Scott Roth
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  The economic burden of incisional ventral hernia repair: a multicentric cost analysis.

Authors:  J-F Gillion; D Sanders; M Miserez; F Muysoms
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.739

8.  Low recurrence rate of a two-layered closure repair for primary and recurrent midline incisional hernia without mesh.

Authors:  A H M Dur; D den Hartog; W E Tuinebreijer; R W Kreis; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 9.  Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias.

Authors:  Dennis den Hartog; Alphons H M Dur; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Robert W Kreis
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

10.  Experience with porcine acellular dermal collagen implant in one-stage tension-free reconstruction of acute and chronic abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  Faisal M Shaikh; Subhasis K Giri; Shaukat Durrani; David Waldron; Pierce A Grace
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.282

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.