Literature DB >> 12942302

Results of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol in more than 61,000 patients.

J Petersein1, C R Peters, M Wolf, B Hamm.   

Abstract

We present results of a postmarketing surveillance study with iobitridol (Xenetix, Sulzbach, Germany) in more than 61,000 patients from 1996 until 2000. The purpose of this study was the assessment of safety and diagnostic efficacy of the non-ionic contrast agent iobitridol in the setting of a post-marketing surveillance study. Iobitridol (Xenetix) has been registered in Germany since 1996. Between 1996 and 2000 207 radiologists have documented in a questionnaire the routine use of Xenetix in 61,754 patients that have received Xenetix for diagnostic procedures. On each questionnaire parameters regarding demographic data, safety, and diagnostic efficacy were assessed. The data were statistically evaluated and analysed. The examination allowed for a diagnosis in 99% of cases. Image quality was rated as "excellent" or "good" in 89.8% of cases. In obese patients there was a significantly higher percentage ( p<0.001) of poor image quality. In 0.1% poor contrast was noted. Of patients, 28.8% had at least one risk factor, and 3.1% had three or more. Adverse events were noted in 2.3% of the examinations, but nearly half of them (1.1%) presented with "feeling of warmth" as the only symptom. Of adverse events, 0.2% were non-transient, and 1 patient died. In 0.2% of patients the procedure was stopped due to adverse events. In 0.9% of patients the causal relationship with the contrast agent was rated as probable (probable+possible=1.1%). The percentage of adverse events (excluding warmth) was independent of iodine concentration and of dose, and was higher in young patients. Xenetix is an efficient contrast agent for radiological procedures and is associated with a low rate of adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12942302     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-002-1583-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  14 in total

1.  Analysis of the factors influencing the osmolality of eight monomeric nonionic iodinated contrast medium molecules.

Authors:  D Violon
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Deaths related to iodinated contrast media reported spontaneously to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1978-1994: effect of the availability of low-osmolality contrast media.

Authors:  D B Spring; M A Bettmann; H E Barkan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media.

Authors:  H Katayama; K Yamaguchi; T Kozuka; T Takashima; P Seez; K Matsuura
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Contrast media for angiography: physicochemical properties, pharmacokinetics and biocompatibility.

Authors:  R Eloy; C Corot; J Belleville
Journal:  Clin Mater       Date:  1991

5.  The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions. Final report.

Authors:  F J Palmer
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1988-11

6.  Assessment of the safety and efficacy of iobitridol, an iodinated contrast medium (30% iodine), in cranial CT.

Authors:  W Taylor; I Moseley
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Xenetix--a milestone in diagnostic imaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1996

8.  Evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of iobitridol (Xenetix) in intravenous urography.

Authors:  P J Fournier; W Steinbrich; P Freitag; E Voegeli
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Safety and cost effectiveness of high-osmolality as compared with low-osmolality contrast material in patients undergoing cardiac angiography.

Authors:  E P Steinberg; R D Moore; N R Powe; R Gopalan; A J Davidoff; M Litt; S Graziano; J A Brinker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Comparative toxic effects of iobitridol and iohexol on the kidney.

Authors:  M Wasaki; H Kawamura; J Sugimoto; M Shimada; Y Satoh; E Tanaka; M Gemba
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  9 in total

1.  Development of water-soluble metallofullerenes as X-ray contrast media.

Authors:  Akihiko Miyamoto; Haruya Okimoto; Hisanori Shinohara; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Clinical observation of the adverse drug reactions caused by non-ionic iodinated contrast media: results from 109,255 cases who underwent enhanced CT examination in Chongqing, China.

Authors:  X Li; J Chen; L Zhang; H Liu; S Wang; X Chen; J Fang; S Wang; W Zhang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Safety of iobitridol in the general population and at-risk patients.

Authors:  Thomas J Vogl; Elmar Honold; Michael Wolf; H Mohajeri; R Hammerstingl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Contemporary imaging techniques for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  T Leiner; M W de Haan; P J Nelemans; J M A van Engelshoven; G B C Vasbinder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Iobitridol: a review of its use as a contrast medium in diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Paul L McCormack
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Transient cortical blindness after cardiac catheterization with iobitridol.

Authors:  Mehmet Yazici; Hakan Ozhan; Ozan Kinay; Baris Kilicaslan; Mustafa Karaca; Hasan Cece; Serdar Biceroglu; Oktay Ergene
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007

7.  Post-marketing surveillance study with iodixanol in 20 185 Chinese patients from routine clinical practices.

Authors:  B-C Zhang; L Hou; B Lv; Y-W Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Comparative assessment of image quality for coronary CT angiography with iobitridol and two contrast agents with higher iodine concentrations: iopromide and iomeprol. A multicentre randomized double-blind trial.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Jean-François Paul; François Laurent; Hans-Christoph Becker; Marco Rengo; Jerome Caudron; Sebastian Leschka; Olivier Vignaux; Gesine Knobloch; Giorgio Benea; Thomas Schlosser; Jordi Andreu; Beatriz Cabeza; Alexis Jacquier; Miguel Souto; Didier Revel; Salah Dine Qanadli; Filippo Cademartiri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  64-Slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and abdominal arteries: comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of iobitridol 350 mgI/ml versus iomeprol 400 mgI/ml in a prospective, randomised, double-blind multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Christian Loewe; Christoph R Becker; Riccardo Berletti; Carlo Alberto Cametti; Jerome Caudron; Walter Coudyzer; Johan De Mey; Massimo Favat; Jean-François Heautot; Sam Heye; Markus Hittinger; Antoine Larralde; Jean-Pierre Lestrat; Roberto Marangoni; Koenraad Nieboer; Peter Reimer; Martin Schwarz; Melanie Schernthaner; Johannes Lammer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.315

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.