| Literature DB >> 12942129 |
M R Hamblin1, J L Miller, I Rizvi, H G Loew, T Hasan.
Abstract
Conjugates between photosensitisers (PS) and charged polymeric carriers are under investigation for photodynamic therapy of cancer and may allow targeting to certain cell types or compartments in tumours. Covalent attachment of polyethylene glycol to macromolecules (pegylation) may alter their pharmacokinetics, cell type targeting, and photophysical properties. Macrophages may take up large amounts of aggregated PS, thus lessening the selectivity for cancer cells in tumours. We investigated the effect of pegylation on the uptake and phototoxicity of poly-L-lysine chlorin(e6) conjugates with either cationic or anionic charges in two cell lines, human ovarian cancer cells and mouse macrophages. The cationic conjugate after pegylation became less aggregated, consumed less oxygen and had reduced cellular uptake. However, the phototoxicity corrected for cellular uptake increased three- to five-fold. In contrast, the anionic succinylated conjugate on pegylation became more aggregated, consumed similar amounts of oxygen, and had higher cellular uptake. The anionic conjugate showed the highest relative phototoxicity towards both the cell lines (compared to the other three conjugates) and it decreased most towards the macrophages after pegylation. Pegylation reduced the amount of oxygen consumed per chlorin(e6) molecule when photosensitised cells were illuminated. These in vitro studies suggest that pegylation alters the phototoxicity of PS conjugates depending on the effect produced on the aggregation state.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12942129 PMCID: PMC2394480 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Effect of pegylation on the extent to which conjugates are aggregated at varying concentrations in serum-containing medium. (A) cationic pL–c and pL–c–PEG, (B) anionic pL–c–succ, and pL–c–PEG–succ. Points are derived from the difference in fluorescence in 0.1 M NaOH/1% SDS between aliquots taken from samples centrifuged at 16 000 g at 4°C and from those agitated at room temperature. Each point is the mean of fluorescence determinations from three aliquots and error bars are s.d.
Oxygen consumption and photobleaching in solution
| pL–c | 60.83±2.75 | 89±4 | 46±1 |
| pL–c | 44.47±2.77 | 73±8 | 39±3 |
| pL–c | 56.22±8.48 | 86±2 | 76±3 |
| pL–c | 57.84±3.02 | 79±8 | 72±2 |
Conjugates were dissolved at a concentration of 2 μM c equivalent in 2 ml 10% serum-containing medium at an initial pO2 of approx. 500 mmHg, in a stirred cuvette fitted with a LICOX oxygen probe. Illumination was carried out with 666 nm light at 75 mW cm−2. Initial rates were calculated from the slope of the tangent to the exponential curve of oxygen consumption and are expressed as mmHg per minute. Photobleaching was determined from the initial and final fluorescence in aliquots of the solution. Mol O2 consumed per mol c was determined from the total O2 consumption and the mol c consumed by photobleaching. Values are means (±s.d.) of triplicate determinations in two separate experiments.
P<0.05 compared to non-PEG conjugate.
Cellular uptake, oxygen consumption in cells and photobleaching of PEG and non-PEG conjugates.
| pL–c | 438±18 | 215±27 | 20±8 | 71±1 | 385±9 | 124±48 | 71±1 | 74±13 |
| pL–c | 112±22 | 80±3 | 12±9 | 73±12 | 146±90 | 101±73 | 73±12 | 73±12 |
| pL–c | 37±6 | 28±5 | 147±9 | 78±1 | 326±239 | 629±204 | 78±1 | 53±20 |
| pL–c | 64±18 | 49±7 | 15±12 | 67±17 | 61±36 | 77±61 | 67±17 | 66±15 |
Cells were incubated with the conjugates at 1 μM c equivalent concentration (for uptake) or 2 μM (J774) and 4 μM (OVCAR-5) for oxygen consumption for 4 h at 37°C in 10% serum-containing medium. Cell pellets were dissolved in 0.1 M NaOH/1% SDS for fluorescence quantification of c, or suspended in PBS for oxygen measurements. An initial pO2 of approx. 300 mmHg was used in a stirred cuvette fitted with a LICOX oxygen probe. Illumination was carried out with 666 nm light at 75 mW cm2. Initial rates were calculated from the slope of the tangent to the exponential curve of oxygen consumption and are expressed as mmHg min−1 nmol−1 c in the 2 ml of cell suspension. Mol O2 consumed per mol c was determined from the total O2 consumption and the mol c consumed by photobleaching. Photobleaching was determined from the initial and final fluorescence in aliquots of the cell suspension. Values are means (±s.d.) of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.
P<0.05 compared to PEG conjugate;
P<0.05 compared to OVCAR-5 cells;
P<0.05 compared to conjugate with anionic charge.
Figure 2Phototoxicity curves comparing the light dose responses of the survival fractions of OVCAR-5 (A, B) and J774 (C, D,) cells incubated with (A, C) cationic pL–c and pL–c–PEG, (B, D) anionic pL–c–succ and pL–c–PEG–succ. Cells were incubated for 3 h in serum-containing medium with conjugates added at 1 μM c equivalent concentrations. After illumination, cells were given fresh medium and 24 h later mitochondrial activity was determined by the MTT test. Survival fraction was calculated as the ratio of the 480 nm absorption from PDT-treated cells, to that from those given conjugate and kept at room temperature in the dark for the duration of the illumination. Points are the means from four separate experiments each containing six wells and bars are s.d.
Figure 3Relative phototoxicity curves comparing the light dose responses of the phototoxicities per nanomoles of c taken up by the two cell lines (J774 and OVCAR-5) with (A) cationic pL–c and pL–c–PEG, (B) succinylated pL–c–succ and pL–c–PEG–succ. Points were calculated from the reciprocal of the survival fraction (from Figures 2A to D) divided by the uptake in nanomoles c equivalent per milligram cell protein (from Table 2). Error bars are the s.d. of the ratios calculated in quadrature.