| Literature DB >> 12942119 |
J N E Ashman1, H S Patmore, L T Condon, L Cawkwell, N D Stafford, J Greenman.
Abstract
A total of 45 primary head and neck squamous cell carcinomas were analysed by comparative genomic hybridisation to identify regions of chromosomal deletion and gain. Multiple regions of copy number aberration were identified including gains affecting chromosomes 3q, 8q, 5p, 7q, 12p and 11q and deletion of material from chromosomes 3p, 11q, 4p, 5q, 8p, 10q, 13q and 21. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed significant correlations between gain of 3q25-27 and deletion of 22q with reduced disease-specific survival. In addition, gain of 17q and 20q, deletion of 19p and 22q and amplification of 11q13 were significantly associated with reduced disease-free survival. A Cox proportional hazards regression model identified deletion of 22q as an independent prognostic marker. The data presented here provide further evidence that the creation of a genetically based tumour classification system will soon be possible, complementing current histopathological characterisation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2003 PMID: 12942119 PMCID: PMC2394495 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Clinicopathological details of the 45 HNSCC patients included in this study
| 45 | 28 | 17 | |
| Male | 35 | 22 | 13 |
| Female | 10 | 6 | 4 |
| Larynx | 21 | 15 | 6 |
| Hypopharynx | 13 | 9 | 4 |
| Oropharynx/oral cavity | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| Parotid | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| T1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| T2 | 12 | 8 | 4 |
| T3 | 9 | 8 | 1 |
| T4 | 23 | 11 | 12 |
| N0 | 15 | 13 | 2 |
| N+ | 30 | 15 | 15 |
| N1 | 8 | 5 | 3 |
| N2 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
| N3 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Well | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Moderate | 18 | 11 | 7 |
| Poor | 22 | 14 | 8 |
| Undifferentiated | 2 | 1 | 1 |
N0=no nodal involvement; N+=with nodal involvement.
Figure 1Summary of all chromosomal gains and losses identified in 45 primary HNSCC tumours by CGH. Lines to the left of the chromosome ideograms represent regions of deletion and lines to the right represent gains. The relative lengths of each line represents the size of the region of gain or loss. All CGH ratio deviations identified using the thresholds detailed in the methods were included. A few, particularly small, regions of copy number change below the accepted resolution of CGH (∼10 Mb) are present and care should be taken in interpreting these.
Frequencies of copy number imbalances identified in this study (>20% of cases), ranked according to the most frequently occurring
| 3q25–q27 | Gain | 75.5 |
| 3q21–q24 | Gain | 62.2 |
| 8q22.2–qter | Gain | 55.6 |
| 3p24–pter | Deletion | 51.1 |
| 11q23.1–qter | Deletion | 48.9 |
| 8q21.1–q22.2 | Gain | 48.9 |
| 3qcen–q13.3 | Gain | 46.7 |
| 8qcen–q21.1 | Gain | 46.7 |
| 5p | Gain | 44.4 |
| 4p14.1–pter | Deletion | 42.2 |
| 3p13–p13.3 | Deletion | 40.0 |
| 5q32–qter | Deletion | 37.8 |
| 8p12–pter | Deletion | 35.6 |
| 7p12–q11.23 | Gain | 35.6 |
| 12p | Gain | 35.6 |
| 11q13.1–q14.1 | Gain | 35.5 |
| 21 | Deletion | 35.5 |
| 3p21.3–p23 | Deletion | 33.3 |
| 10q24.1–qter | Deletion | 33.3 |
| 13q22–qter | Deletion | 33.3 |
| 1q23–q31 | Gain | 31.1 |
| 4qcen–q21.3 | Gain | 31.1 |
| 4q32–qter | Deletion | 28.9 |
| 18q22–qter | Deletion | 28.9 |
| 9q33–qter | Deletion | 26.7 |
| 6qcen–q16.1 | Gain | 24.4 |
| 1p35–pter | Deletion | 24.4 |
| 11p14–pter | Deletion | 24.4 |
| 2q36–qter | Deletion | 24.4 |
| 18q11.2 | Gain | 24.4 |
| 9q13–q22.2 | Gain | 22.2 |
| 18p | Gain | 22.2 |
| 19p13.2–pter | Deletion | 22.2 |
| 7q31.3–qter | Deletion | 22.2 |
| 10p14–qter | Deletion | 22.2 |
| 12q21.2–q21.3 | Gain | 22.2 |
| 14q13–q21 | Gain | 20.0 |
| 9p21–pter | Deletion | 20.0 |
| 15q11.2–q15 | Deletion | 20.0 |
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier survival curves for disease-specific survival in tumours demonstrating (A) tumours with pathologically proven nodal involvement at time of surgery, (B) gains specifically within the region 3q25–q27, (C) gains on 3q and (D) deletion of 22q. Dotted lines represent tumours that exhibited the chromosomal imbalance (or nodal involvement in the case of A) and solid lines represent those that did not. Crosses indicate censored cases (patients alive at time of analysis).
Chromosomal aberrations demonstrating a significant association with disease-free (upper) and disease-specific survival (lower)
| Nodal status | — | 0.039 | 30 | (N+) 33.4 | (N0) 54.2 |
| 17q | Gain | 0.049 | 9 | 10.9 | 44.4 |
| 20q | Gain | 0.001 | 5 | 4.6 | 46.1 |
| 19p | Deletion | 0.002 | 10 | 13.5 | 44.9 |
| 22q | Deletion | 0.004 | 8 | 8.7 | 45.2 |
| 11q13 | Amplification | 0.001 | 4 | 3.7 | 44.1 |
| Nodal status (at surgery) | — | 0.024 | 30 | (N+) 43.9 | (N0) 63.9 |
| 3q25–27 | Gain | 0.043 | 34 | 44.9 | 63.3 |
| 22q | Deletion | 0.011 | 8 | 17.0 | 54.9 |
N+=with nodal involvement; N0=without nodal involvement.
Cox proportional hazard analysis
| Nodal status | 4.42 (1.00–19.44) | 0.049 |
| 22q deletion | 3.19 (1.04–9.80) | 0.042 |
| 3q25–27 gain | 3.27 (0.73–14.58) | 0.121 |