Literature DB >> 1294198

The function relating the subjective magnitude of brain stimulation reward to stimulation strength varies with site of stimulation.

M Leon1, C R Gallistel.   

Abstract

A two-lever choice paradigm with concurrent variable interval schedules of reward was used to measure the growth in the subjective magnitude of reward as a function of current, by finding the adjustment in the stimulating current required to offset a given difference in the rates at which two rewards were received. Increasing current by a factor of 2 increased subjective reward magnitude by a factor ranging from as little as 3 to as much as 4,000. This range was about as great between electrodes within one rat as between electrodes and rats. In the light of earlier findings regarding the equivalent effects of increments is current and pulse frequency, these large differences cannot readily be explained by differing fiber densities at the site of stimulation. It is suggested that the medial forebrain bundle terminates in more than one spatio-temporal integration mechanism. The magnitude of the spatio-temporally integrated effect of a barrage of action potentials in the reward-relevant axons depends on which subset of reward-relevant axons is excited by the stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1294198     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80229-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Optimal indolence: a normative microscopic approach to work and leisure.

Authors:  Ritwik K Niyogi; Yannick-Andre Breton; Rebecca B Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal; Peter Dayan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Cannabinoid receptor blockade reduces the opportunity cost at which rats maintain operant performance for rewarding brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ivan Trujillo-Pisanty; Giovanni Hernandez; Ian Moreau-Debord; Marie-Pierre Cossette; Kent Conover; Joseph F Cheer; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  At what stage of neural processing does cocaine act to boost pursuit of rewards?

Authors:  Giovanni Hernandez; Yannick-André Breton; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A new view of the effect of dopamine receptor antagonism on operant performance for rewarding brain stimulation in the rat.

Authors:  I Trujillo-Pisanty; K Conover; P Shizgal
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Scarce means with alternative uses: robbins' definition of economics and its extension to the behavioral and neurobiological study of animal decision making.

Authors:  Peter Shizgal
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Valuation of opportunity costs by rats working for rewarding electrical brain stimulation.

Authors:  Rebecca Brana Solomon; Kent Conover; Peter Shizgal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.