Literature DB >> 12941680

D-dimer levels and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Sabine Eichinger1, Erich Minar, Christine Bialonczyk, Mirko Hirschl, Peter Quehenberger, Barbara Schneider, Ansgar Weltermann, Oswald Wagner, Paul A Kyrle.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Widespread screening of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) for thrombophilic risk factors has become common clinical practice. Because of the increasing number of risk factors, assessing the risk of recurrence in an individual patient is intricate; therefore, a laboratory method that measures multifactorial thrombophilia is required.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively study the relationship between the risk of recurrent VTE and D-dimer, a global marker of coagulation activation and fibrinolysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective cohort study of 610 patients older than 18 years who were treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 months with a first spontaneous VTE, in whom D-dimer levels were measured shortly after discontinuation of oral anticoagulation. The study was conducted at the Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, Vienna, Austria. Patients entered the study at time of discontinuation of oral anticoagulants and were observed at 3-month intervals during the first year and every 6 months thereafter from July 1992 to October 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Objectively documented symptomatic recurrent VTE.
RESULTS: A total of 79 (13%) of 610 patients had recurrent VTE with a mean observation time of 38 months. Patients with recurrence had significantly higher D-dimer levels compared with those without recurrence (553 ng/mL vs 427 ng/mL, P =.01). Compared with patients with D-dimer levels of 750 ng/mL or higher, the relative risk (RR) of recurrence was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.4), 0.6 (95% CI, 0.3-1.2), and 0.3 (95% CI, 0.1-0.6) in patients with D-dimer levels of 500 to 749 ng/mL, 250 to 499 ng/mL, and less than 250 ng/mL, respectively. The cumulative probability of recurrent VTE at 2 years was 3.7% (95% CI, 0.9%-6.5%) among patients with D-dimer levels of less than 250 ng/mL compared with 11.5% (95% CI, 8.0%-15.0%) among patients with higher levels (P =.001). Patients with D-dimer levels of less than 250 ng/mL had a 60% lower RR of recurrence compared with patients with higher levels (RR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8).
CONCLUSION: Patients with a first spontaneous VTE and a D-dimer level of less than 250 ng/mL after withdrawal of oral anticoagulation have a low risk of VTE recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12941680     DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.8.1071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  49 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for venous and arterial thrombosis.

Authors:  Emanuele Previtali; Paolo Bucciarelli; Serena M Passamonti; Ida Martinelli
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  D-dimer for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a call for sticking to evidence.

Authors:  Grégoire Le Gal; Henri Bounameaux
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-10-14       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Association between plasma levels of D-dimer and fibrinogen/fibrin degradation products (FDP) for exclusion of thromboembolic disorders.

Authors:  Rafael Noal Moresco; Ronald Halla Júnior; Luis Cláudio Rosa Vargas; Lúcia Mariano da Rocha Silla
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  How I treat venous thrombosis in children.

Authors:  Marilyn J Manco-Johnson
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Differential diagnosis of glomerular disease: a systematic and inclusive approach.

Authors:  Lee A Hebert; Samir Parikh; Jason Prosek; Tibor Nadasdy; Brad H Rovin
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 7.  Update in general internal medicine.

Authors:  Toshiko Uchida; Stephen D Persell; David W Baker
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Role of thrombophilia testing: con.

Authors:  Scott M Stevens
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Recent advances in the management of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Walter Ageno
Journal:  Korean J Hematol       Date:  2010-03-31

10.  Use of D-dimer testing to determine duration of anticoagulation, risk of cardiovascular events and occult cancer after a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism: the extended follow-up of the PROLONG study.

Authors:  Benilde Cosmi; Cristina Legnani; Alberto Tosetto; Vittorio Pengo; Angelo Ghirarduzzi; Adriano Alatri; Domenico Prisco; Daniela Poli; Armando Tripodi; Gualtiero Palareti
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.