Literature DB >> 12940570

Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage.

Ahmet Keles1, Nejat Erverdi, Serdar Sezen.   

Abstract

Palatal implants have been used over the last two decades to eliminate headgear wear and to establish stationary anchorage. In this case report, the stability of a palatal implant for distalization of molars bodily and for anchorage maintenance was assessed. The implant was a stepped screw titanium (4.5 mm diameter x 8 mm length), and it was placed in the palatal region for orthodontic purposes. A surgical template containing a metal drill housing was prepared. Angulation of the drill housing was controlled according to the radiologic tracing of the maxilla transferred to a plaster cast section in the paramedian plane. The implant was placed using a noninvasive technique (incision, flap, and suture elimination) and left transmucosally to facilitate the surgical procedure and to reduce the number of operations. The paramedian region was selected (1) to avoid the connective tissues of the palatine suture and (2) because it is considered to be a suitable host site for implant placement. After three months of healing, the implant was osseointegrated and orthodontic treatment was initiated. For molar distalization, the Keles Slider appliance was modified and, instead of a Nance button, a palatal implant was used for anchorage. The results showed that the molars were distalized bodily at five months, and no anchorage loss was observed. At the end of the treatment, the smile was improved, and an ideal Class I molar and canine relationship, an ideal overbite, and an ideal overjet were all achieved. In conclusion, palatal implants can be used effectively for anchorage maintenance and in space-gaining procedures. Use of a three-dimensional surgical template eliminated implant placement errors, reduced chair time, minimized trauma to the tissues, and enhanced osseointegration. This method can be used effectively to achieve distalization of molars bodily without anchorage loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12940570     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(2003)073<0471:BDOMWA>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Long-term stability of miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization in Class II treatment.

Authors:  Till Edward Bechtold; Young-Chel Park; Kyung-Ho Kim; Heekyu Jung; Ju-Young Kang; Yoon Jeong Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Zygomatic mini-implant for Class II correction in growing patients.

Authors:  M M El-Dawlatly; A M Abou-El-Ezz; F A El-Sharaby; Y A Mostafa
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series.

Authors:  Devinder Preet Singh; Shefali Arora; Sumit Kumar Yadav; Neal Bharat Kedia
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

4.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.

Authors:  Mümin Kırcalı; Alime Sema Yüksel
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.

Authors:  Metin Nur; Mehmet Bayram; Mevlut Celikoglu; Dogan Kilkis; Ali Alper Pampu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.

Authors:  Cagla Sar; Burcak Kaya; Omur Ozsoy; Ayca Arman Özcirpici
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Bilateral en-masse distalization of maxillary posterior teeth with skeletal anchorage: a case report.

Authors:  Saeed Noorollahian; Shiva Alavi; Farinaz Shirban
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016-06

9.  Comparison of maxillary molar distalization with an implant-supported distal jet and a traditional tooth-supported distal jet appliance.

Authors:  Mauro Cozzani; Marco Pasini; Francesco Zallio; Robert Ritucci; Sabrina Mutinelli; Laura Mazzotta; Maria Rita Giuca; Vincenzo Piras
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-06-11

10.  Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of hard and soft tissue thicknesses in the midpalatal suture region to facilitate orthodontic mini-implant placement.

Authors:  Song-Hee Oh; Sae Rom Lee; Jin-Young Choi; Seong-Hun Kim; Eui-Hwan Hwang; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.