Literature DB >> 12937550

An Assessment of Athletic Training Students' Clinical-Placement Hours.

Michael G Miller1, David C Berry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish a time profile to determine how athletic training students use their time in clinical placements and to determine the effects of academic standing, sex, sport type, and risk of injury associated with a sport during athletic training students' clinical placements on instructional, clinical, unengaged, managerial, and active learning time. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Subjects were enrolled in clinical placements within National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletics, intramural sports, and a local high school. Students were individually videotaped for approximately 4 hours.
SUBJECTS: A total of 20 undergraduate athletic training students (17 women, 3 men) from a Committee on Accreditation of Allied Health Education Programs (CAAHEP)-accredited athletic training education program. MEASUREMENTS: We created a conceptual behavioral time framework to examine athletic training students' use of clinical-placement time with the performance domains associated with the 1999 National Athletic Trainers' Association Board of Certification Role Delineation Study. Students' use of time was analyzed with the Behavior Evaluation Strategies and Taxonomies software.
RESULTS: Students spent 7% of their overall clinical-placement time in instructional activities, 23% in clinical activities, 10% in managerial activities, and 59% in unengaged activities. Using multiple 3 x 3 factorial analyses of variance, we found that advanced students were engaged in significantly more active learning and clinical time compared with novice and intermediate students. Students assigned to sports in which injuries predominately occur in the upper extremities (upper extremity sports) spent significantly more clinical-placement time unengaged compared with students assigned to sports in which injuries predominantly occur in the lower extremities (lower extremity sports) or in both upper and lower extremities (mixed extremity sports).
CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, we examined only the clinical-placement component of 1 athletic training program; therefore, it may not be accurate to generalize the results for all CAAHEP-accredited programs. However, these results can be used by athletic training educators to examine the amount of time students are actually engaged in specific domains of athletic training, to determine the domains in which skills are most commonly being performed, to identify the relationships between the students and clinical instructors or supervisors, and to develop clinical placements in which students learn and practice clinical and educational competencies.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 12937550      PMCID: PMC164430     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  12 in total

1.  Clinical experience in undergraduate education: issues and challenges.

Authors:  C Trevitt
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 1.787

2.  Check the quality not the length.

Authors:  L Redfern
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1999 Sep 15-21

3.  Nursing education as cognitive apprenticeship. A framework for clinical education.

Authors:  K L Taylor; W D Care
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.082

4.  Learning on clinical placement: the experience of six Australian student nurses.

Authors:  C A Nolan
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Clinical teaching roles of athletic trainers.

Authors:  D T Foster; D K Leslie
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Clinical Experiences Are Not Predictive of Outcomes on the NATABOC Examination.

Authors:  P S Turocy; R E Comfort; D H Perrin; J H Gieck
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Clinical performance of university nursing graduates.

Authors:  D Battersby; L Hemmings
Journal:  Aust J Adv Nurs       Date:  1991 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 0.647

8.  The clinical experience of novice students in nursing.

Authors:  K M Neill; A K McCoy; C B Parry; J Cohran; J C Curtis; R B Ransom
Journal:  Nurse Educ       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.082

9.  'Being there': learning through active participation.

Authors:  C Wilkinson; L Peters; K Mitchell; T Irwin; K McCorrie; M MacLeod
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Some ambiguities of the student's role in undergraduate nurse training.

Authors:  P Ashworth; P Morrison
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.187

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of Clinical Field-Experience Setting on Athletic Training Students' Perceived Percentage of Time Spent on Active Learning.

Authors:  David C. Berry; Michael G. Miller; Leisha M. Berry
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Student retention in athletic training education programs.

Authors:  Thomas M Dodge; Murray F Mitchell; James M Mensch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Clinical integration and how it affects student retention in undergraduate athletic training programs.

Authors:  Allison Young; Joanne Klossner; Carrie L Docherty; Thomas M Dodge; James M Mensch
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Frustrations among graduates of athletic training education programs.

Authors:  Thomas G Bowman; Thomas M Dodge
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Clinical instructors' and athletic training students' perceptions of teachable moments in an athletic training clinical education setting.

Authors:  Valerie J Rich
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Characteristics of Patient Encounters for Athletic Training Students During Clinical Education: A Report From the Association for Athletic Training Education Research Network.

Authors:  Cailee E Welch Bacon; Julie M Cavallario; Stacy E Walker; R Curtis Bay; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.824

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.