Literature DB >> 12937521

Cryotherapy, Sensation, and Isometric-Force Variability.

Mack D. Rubley1, Craig R. Denegar, William E. Buckley, Karl M. Newell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in sensation of pressure, 2-point discrimination, and submaximal isometric-force production variability due to cryotherapy. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Sensation was assessed using a 2 x 2 x 2 x 3 repeated-measures factorial design, with treatment (ice immersion or control), limb (right or left), digit (finger or thumb), and sensation test time (baseline, posttreatment, or postisometric-force trials) as independent variables. Dependent variables were changes in sensation of pressure and 2-point discrimination. Isometric-force variability was tested with a 2 x 2 x 3 repeated-measures factorial design. Treatment condition (ice immersion or control), limb (right or left), and percentage (10, 25, or 40) of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) were the independent variables. The dependent variables were the precision or variability (the standard deviation of mean isometric force) and the accuracy or targeting error (the root mean square error) of the isometric force for each percentage of MVIC.
SUBJECTS: Fifteen volunteer college students (8 men, 7 women; age = 22 +/- 3 years; mass = 72 +/- 21.9 kg; height = 183.4 +/- 11.6 cm). MEASUREMENTS: We measured sensation in the distal palmar aspect of the index finger and thumb. Sensation of pressure and 2-point discrimination were measured before treatment (baseline), after treatment (15 minutes of ice immersion or control), and at the completion of isometric testing (final). Variability (standard deviation of mean isometric force) of the submaximal isometric finger forces was measured by having the subjects exert a pinching force with the thumb and index finger for 30 seconds. Subjects performed the pinching task at the 3 submaximal levels of MVIC (10%, 25%, and 40%), with the order of trials assigned randomly. The subjects were given a target representing the submaximal percentage of MVIC and visual feedback of the force produced as they pinched the testing device. The force exerted was measured using strain gauges mounted on an apparatus built to measure finger forces.
RESULTS: Sensation of pressure was less (ie, it took greater pressure to elicit a response) after ice immersion, thumbs were more affected than index fingers, and the decrease was greater in the right limb than the left. Two-point discrimination was not affected by cryotherapy but was higher in the finger than in the thumb under all conditions. Isometric-force variability (standard deviation of mean isometric force) was greater as percentage of force increased from 10% to 40% of MVIC. Targeting accuracy (root mean square error) was decreased at 40% of MVIC. Accuracy and force variability were not affected by cryotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The application of cryotherapy and reduced sensation of pressure appear to have little effect on motor control of the digits. These results support the hypothesis that the use of cold is not contraindicated for use as an analgesic before submaximal rehabilitative exercise focusing on restoring neuromuscular control to injured tissues.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 12937521      PMCID: PMC164899     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  26 in total

1.  Finger numbness after acute local exposure to cold.

Authors:  R MORTON; K A PROVINS
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1960-01       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Manual dexterity in the cold.

Authors:  W H TEICHNER
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1957-11       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  The influence of combined visual and tactile information on finger and eye movements during shape tracing.

Authors:  M Akamatsu
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Cooling does not affect knee proprioception.

Authors:  J C Ozmun; H A Thieme; C D Ingersoll; K L Knight
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Cryotherapy and sequential exercise bouts following cryotherapy on concentric and eccentric strength in the quadriceps.

Authors:  D H Ruiz; J W Myrer; E Durrant; G W Fellingham
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  A preliminary examination of cryotherapy and secondary injury in skeletal muscle.

Authors:  M A Merrick; J M Rankin; F A Andres; C L Hinman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Difference in sensibility between the dominant and nondominant index finger as tested using the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments pressure aesthesiometer.

Authors:  J J Hage; L P van der Steen; P J de Groot
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Duration of contact time alters cutaneous pressure threshold measurements.

Authors:  D van Vliet; C B Novak; S E Mackinnon
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.539

9.  Tactual discrimination of softness.

Authors:  M A Srinivasan; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Secondary injury after musculoskeletal trauma: a review and update.

Authors:  Mark A Merrick
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  10 in total

1.  Immediate effects of cryotherapy on static and dynamic balance.

Authors:  Matthew Douglas; Serena Bivens; Jennifer Pesterfield; Nathan Clemson; Whitney Castle; Gisela Sole; Craig A Wassinger
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-02

2.  The magnitude of tissue cooling during cryotherapy with varied types of compression.

Authors:  David Tomchuk; Mack D Rubley; William R Holcomb; Mark Guadagnoli; Jason M Tarno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  The effect of pinch span on pinch force sense in healthy participants.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yan-Xia Li; Chong-Long Zhang; Dong-Hai Zhang
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Skin Cooling and Force Replication at the Ankle in Healthy Individuals: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Daniela Pacheco dos Santos Haupenthal; Marcos de Noronha; Alessandro Haupenthal; Caroline Ruschel; Guilherme S Nunes
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  The effects of cryotherapy on proprioception system.

Authors:  Mariusz Paweł Furmanek; Kajetan Słomka; Grzegorz Juras
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The Effects of Cryotherapy on Knee Joint Position Sense and Force Production Sense in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Mariusz P Furmanek; Kajetan J Słomka; Andrzej Sobiesiak; Marian Rzepko; Grzegorz Juras
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.193

7.  Intra-articular temperatures of the knee in sports - an in-vivo study of jogging and alpine skiing.

Authors:  Christoph Becher; Jan Springer; Sven Feil; Guiliano Cerulli; Hans H Paessler
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Effect of quadriceps and hamstrings muscle cooling on standing balance in healthy young men.

Authors:  A H Alghadir; S Anwer; H Zafar; E S Al-Eisa
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Effect of Force Level and Gender on Pinch Force Perception in Healthy Adults.

Authors:  Lin Li; Yanxia Li; Huihui Wang; Wenqi Chen; Xinyu Liu
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2020-05-20

10.  The Relationship Between Evaluation Methods for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Authors:  Yoichiro Yoshida; Atsushi Satoh; Teppei Yamada; Naoya Aisu; Taisuke Matsuoka; Tomoko Koganemaru; Ryuji Kajitani; Taro Munechika; Yoshiko Matsumoto; Hideki Nagano; Akira Komono; Ryohei Sakamoto; Mitsuaki Morimoto; Hisatomi Arima; Suguru Hasegawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.