Literature DB >> 12934737

Advancements in minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Barry J Waldman1.   

Abstract

Orthopedic surgeons have successfully performed total hip arthroplasty (THA) for more than 40 years. During this time it has continued to evolve into a more predictable and refined procedure. Minimally invasive surgery represents one of the most recent techniques to have emerged within THA. In conventional THA, the incision typically measures 20-30 cm depending on the patient. Although conventional THA affords wide exposure of the hip joint, it also leads to a predictably large blood loss and significant rehabilitation time. Minimally invasive approaches, defined as less invasive to the skin, muscles, or bone, may reduce complications and potentially improve recovery time. Minimizing the recovery process is becoming increasingly desirable in a society that demands an individual to return to normal activities after a short recovery. There are a number of potential approaches and methods that may improve the results of THA. Complications of minimally invasive surgery may include sciatic or femoral nerve palsy, component malpositioning, intraoperative fracture, leg length discrepancy, and damage to muscles or skin by excessive retraction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12934737     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20030802-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  10 in total

1.  Cementless femoral prostheses cost more to implant than cemented femoral prostheses.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Apostolos Dimitroulias; Michael P Bolognesi; Katherine L Hwang; Stuart B Goodman; Randall E Marcus
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting?

Authors:  C N Peck; A Foster; G J McLauchlan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Anterolateral intermuscular approach for type A2 intertrochanteric fractures: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Binhua Li; Bin Zhang; Zhihui Ding; Yuan Liu; Min Dai
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

4.  Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  T Shitama; T Kiyama; M Naito; K Shiramizu; G Huang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Minimally-invasive total hip arthroplasty will improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  C Yang; Q Zhu; Y Han; J Zhu; H Wang; R Cong; D Zhang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  The Stolzalpe technique: a modified Watson-Jones approach.

Authors:  R Graf; M Azizbaig Mohajer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Posterior single-incision approach to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T V Swanson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The benefit of modified rehabilitation and minimally invasive techniques in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Anastasios K Lilikakis; Beryl Gillespie; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  The impact of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty on the standard procedure.

Authors:  Miklós Szendrõi; Gergely Sztrinkai; Roland Vass; János Kiss
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 10.  Unsupervised Home Exercises Versus Formal Physical Therapy After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yash P Chaudhry; Hunter Hayes; Zachary Wells; Efstratios Papadelis; Alfonso Arevalo; Timothy Horan; Harpal S Khanuja; Carl Deirmengian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.