Literature DB >> 1293446

Faradic resistance of the electrode/electrolyte interface.

S Mayer1, L A Geddes, J D Bourland, L Ogborn.   

Abstract

A new method is used to measure the direct-current (Faradic) resistance of a single electrode/electrolyte interface. The method employs a constant-current pulse and a potential-sensing electrode. By choosing a sufficiently long pulse duration, the voltage between the test and potential-sensing electrode exhibits a three-phase response. In the steady-state phase, the voltage measured is equal to the current flowing through the electrode Faradic resistance and the resistance of the electrolyte between the test and potential-sensing electrode. By measuring this latter resistance with a high-frequency sinusoidal alternating current, the voltage drop in the electrolyte is calculated and subtracted from the voltage measured between the test and potential-sensing electrode, thereby allowing calculation of the Faradic resistance. By plotting the reciprocal of the Faradic resistance against current density and fitting the data points to a third-order polynomial, it is possible to determine the zero-current density (Faradic) resistance. This technique was used to determine the Faradic resistance of electrodes (0.1 cm2) of stainless-steel, platinum, platinum-iridium and rhodium in 0.9 per cent NaCl at 25 degrees. The zero current Faradic resistance is lowest for platinum (30.3 k omega), slightly higher for platinum-iridium (47.6k omega), much higher for rhodium (111k omega) and highest for type 316 stainless-steel (345k omega). In all cases, the Faradic resistance decreases dramatically with increasing current density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1293446     DOI: 10.1007/bf02457834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  13 in total

1.  AN ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF METAL ELECTRODES.

Authors:  J WEINMAN; J MAHLER
Journal:  Med Electron Biol Eng       Date:  1964-07

2.  Electrical properties of metallic electrodes.

Authors:  T Ragheb; L A Geddes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Myocardial stimulation: the electrochemistry of electrode-tissue coupling.

Authors:  P B Mansfield
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1967-06

4.  The impedance of stainless-steel electrodes.

Authors:  L A Geddes; C P Da Costa; G Wise
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1971-09

5.  The electrical and biological properties of tungsten microelectrodes.

Authors:  M T Block
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1968-09

6.  Optimum electrolytic chloriding of silver electrodes.

Authors:  L A Geddes; L E Baker; A G Moore
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1969-01

7.  Nonlinearity of cardiac pacemaker electrodes.

Authors:  D Jaron; S A Briller; H P Schwan; D B Geselowitz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Electrode polarization impedance and measurements in biological materials.

Authors:  H P Schwan
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1968-02-01       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Linear and nonlinear properties of platinum electrode polarisation. Part 1: frequency dependence at very low frequencies.

Authors:  B Onaral; H P Schwan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 2.602

10.  Electrochemical polarization of physiological electrodes.

Authors:  W Greatbatch
Journal:  Med Res Eng       Date:  1967
View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of materials and geometry on fields produced by cochlear electrode arrays.

Authors:  H A Ruddy; G E Loeb
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of electrode interface impedance on finite element models of transvenous defibrillation.

Authors:  P H Schimpf; G Johnson; D B Jorgenson; D R Haynor; G H Bardy; Y Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Patient-specific models of deep brain stimulation: influence of field model complexity on neural activation predictions.

Authors:  Ashutosh Chaturvedi; Christopher R Butson; Scott F Lempka; Scott E Cooper; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Real-Time Localization of Cochlear-Implant Electrode Arrays Using Bipolar Impedance Sensing.

Authors:  Trevor L Bruns; Katherine E Riojas; Robert F Labadie; Robert J Webster Iii
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  An equivalent circuit model for localized electroporation on porous substrates.

Authors:  Justin R Brooks; Ikhlaas Mungloo; Siamak Mirfendereski; Jacob P Quint; Dominic Paul; Arian Jaberi; Jae Sung Park; Ruiguo Yang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 10.618

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.