Literature DB >> 12933457

Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI of the breast: analysis of dose response and comparison with gadopentetate dimeglumine.

Michael V Knopp1, Michael W Bourne, Francesco Sardanelli, Martin N Wasser, Lorenzo Bonomo, Carla Boetes, Markus Müller-Schimpfle, Margaret A Hall-Craggs, Bernd Hamm, Antonio Orlacchio, Carlo Bartolozzi, Mareike Kessler, Uwe Fischer, Günther Schneider, Matthijs Oudkerk, William L Teh, Hans-Björn Gehl, Isabella Salerio, Gianpaolo Pirovano, Anna La Noce, Miles A Kirchin, Alberto Spinazzi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and dose response relationship of three doses of gadobenate dimeglumine for MRI of the breast and to compare the results with those obtained after a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight of gadopentetate dimeglumine. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Gadobenate dimeglumine at 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mmol/kg of body weight or gadopentetate dimeglumine at 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight was administered by IV bolus injection to 189 patients with known or suspected breast cancer. Coronal three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo images were acquired before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 min after the administration of the dose. Images were evaluated for lesion presence, location, size, morphology, enhancement pattern, conspicuity, and type. Lesion signal intensity-time curves were acquired, and lesion matching with on-site final diagnosis was performed. A determination of global lesion detection from unenhanced to contrast-enhanced and combined images was performed, and evaluations were made of the diagnostic accuracy for lesion detection and characterization. A full safety evaluation was conducted.
RESULTS: Significant dose-related increases in global lesion detection were noted for patients who received gadobenate dimeglumine (p < 0.04, all evaluations). The sensitivity for detection was comparable for 0.1 and 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine, and specificity was highest with the 0.1 mmol/kg dose. Higher detection scores and higher sensitivity values for lesion characterization were found for 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine compared with 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine, although more variable specificity values were obtained. No differences in safety were observed, and no serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: Gadobenate dimeglumine is a capable diagnostic agent for MRI of the breast. Although preliminary, our results suggest that 0.1 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine may offer advantages over doses of 0.05 and 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobenate dimeglumine and 0.1 mmol/kg of gadopentetate dimeglumine for breast lesion detection and characterization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12933457     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.3.1810663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  11 in total

1.  Intra-individual randomised comparison of gadobutrol 1.0 M versus gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M in patients scheduled for preoperative breast MRI.

Authors:  K Kinkel; C Schwenke; R Kubik-Huch; F Pediconi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Preliminary study: Breast cancers can be well seen on 3T breast MRI with a half-dose of gadobutrol.

Authors:  Amy N Melsaether; Eric Kim; Eralda Mema; James Babb; Sungheon Gene Kim
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  Intraindividual, randomized comparison of the macrocyclic contrast agents gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eva M Fallenberg; Diane M Renz; Bettina Karle; Carsten Schwenke; Barbara Ingod-Heppner; Angela Reles; Florian J Engelken; Alexander Huppertz; Bernd Hamm; Matthias Taupitz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging of claustrophobic or oversized patients using an open low-field magnet.

Authors:  M Calabrese; D Brizzi; L Carbonaro; M Chiaramondia; M A Kirchin; F Sardanelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 6.  MR imaging of the breast: indications, established technique, and new directions.

Authors:  F Sardanelli; A Iozzelli; A Fausto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.034

7.  Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  I Griebsch; J Brown; C Boggis; A Dixon; M Dixon; D Easton; R Eeles; D G Evans; F J Gilbert; J Hawnaur; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; J Potterton; D Thompson; L W Turnbull; L G Walker; R Warren; M O Leach
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Relating Doses of Contrast Agent Administered to TIC and Semi-Quantitative Parameters on DCE-MRI: Based on a Murine Breast Tumor Model.

Authors:  Menglin Wu; Li Lu; Qi Zhang; Qi Guo; Feixiang Zhao; Tongwei Li; Xuening Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The Efficacy of One Molar Contrast Material in the Evaluation of Breast Lesions with MR Imaging.

Authors:  Nursen Toprak; Ozkan Unal; Serhat Avcu
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.