Literature DB >> 12931883

Size and performance of anoxic limestone drains to neutralize acidic mine drainage.

Charles A Cravotta1.   

Abstract

Acidic mine drainage (AMD) can be neutralized effectively in underground, anoxic limestone drains (ALDs). Owing to reaction between the AMD and limestone (CaCO3), the pH and concentrations of alkalinity and calcium increase asymptotically with detention time in the ALD, while concentrations of sulfate, ferrous iron, and manganese typically are unaffected. This paper introduces a method to predict the alkalinity produced within an ALD and to estimate the mass of limestone required for its construction on the basis of data from short-term, closed-container (cubitainer) tests. The cubitainer tests, which used an initial mass of 4 kg crushed limestone completely inundated with 2.8 L AMD, were conducted for 11 to 16 d and provided estimates for the initial and maximum alkalinities and corresponding rates of alkalinity production and limestone dissolution. Long-term (5-11 yr) data for alkalinity and CaCO3 flux at the Howe Bridge, Morrison, and Buck Mountain ALDs in Pennsylvania, USA, indicate that rates of alkalinity production and limestone dissolution under field conditions were comparable with those in cubitainers filled with limestone and AMD from each site. The alkalinity of effluent and intermediate samples along the flow path through the ALDs and long-term trends in the residual mass of limestone and the effluent alkalinity were estimated as a function of the computed detention time within the ALD and second-order dissolution rate models for cubitainer tests. Thus, cubitainer tests can be a useful tool for designing ALDs and predicting their performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12931883     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.1277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  6 in total

Review 1.  Acid mine drainage in the Iberian Pyrite Belt: 2. Lessons learned from recent passive remediation experiences.

Authors:  Carlos Ayora; Manuel A Caraballo; Francisco Macias; Tobias S Rötting; Jesús Carrera; Jose-Miguel Nieto
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Iron transformations induced by an acid-tolerant Desulfosporosinus species.

Authors:  Doug Bertel; John Peck; Thomas J Quick; John M Senko
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Formation mechanism of carbide slag composite sustained-alkalinity-release particles for the source control of acid mine drainage.

Authors:  Jichi Bai; Haiqin Zhang; Liping Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Biological remediation of acid mine drainage: Review of past trends and current outlook.

Authors:  K Rambabu; Fawzi Banat; Quan Minh Pham; Shih-Hsin Ho; Nan-Qi Ren; Pau Loke Show
Journal:  Environ Sci Ecotechnol       Date:  2020-03-19

5.  Mapping and prediction of coal workers' pneumoconiosis with bioavailable iron content in the bituminous coals.

Authors:  Xi Huang; Weihong Li; Michael D Attfield; Arthur Nádas; Krystyna Frenkel; Robert B Finkelman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Direct nanoscale observations of the coupled dissolution of calcite and dolomite and the precipitation of gypsum.

Authors:  Francesco Giancarlo Offeddu; Jordi Cama; Josep Maria Soler; Christine V Putnis
Journal:  Beilstein J Nanotechnol       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.649

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.