Literature DB >> 12930739

Associations between inverted repeats and the structural evolution of bacterial genomes.

Guillaume Achaz1, Eric Coissac, Pierre Netter, Eduardo P C Rocha.   

Abstract

The stability of the structure of bacterial genomes is challenged by recombination events. Since major rearrangements (i.e., inversions) are thought to frequently operate by homologous recombination between inverted repeats, we analyzed the presence and distribution of such repeats in bacterial genomes and their relation to the conservation of chromosomal structure. First, we show that there is a strong under-representation of inverted repeats, relative to direct repeats, in most chromosomes, especially among the ones regarded as most stable. Second, we show that the avoidance of repeats is frequently associated with the stability of the genomes. Closely related genomes reported to differ in terms of stability are also found to differ in the number of inverted repeats. Third, when using replication strand bias as a proxy for genome stability, we find a significant negative correlation between this strand bias and the abundance of inverted repeats. Fourth, when measuring the recombining potential of inverted repeats and their eventual impact on different features of the chromosomal structure, we observe a tendency of repeats to be located in the chromosome in such a way that rearrangements produce a smaller strand switch and smaller asymmetries than expected by chance. Finally, we discuss the limitations of our analysis and the influence of factors such as the nature of repeats, e.g., transposases, or the differences in the recombination machinery among bacteria. These results shed light on the challenges imposed on the genome structure by the presence of inverted repeats.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12930739      PMCID: PMC1462642     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  37 in total

1.  Localized remodeling of the Escherichia coli chromosome: the patchwork of segments refractory and tolerant to inversion near the replication terminus.

Authors:  M I Guijo; J Patte; M del Mar Campos; J M Louarn; J E Rebollo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genome alignment, evolution of prokaryotic genome organization, and prediction of gene function using genomic context.

Authors:  Y I Wolf; I B Rogozin; A S Kondrashov; E V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Replication orientation affects the rate and direction of bacterial gene evolution.

Authors:  E R Tillier; R A Collins
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  The differential killing of genes by inversions in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  P Mackiewicz; D Mackiewicz; A Gierlik; M Kowalczuk; A Nowicka; M Dudkiewicz; M R Dudek; S Cebrat
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 5.  Therefore, what are recombination proteins there for?

Authors:  J Courcelle; A K Ganesan; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Evolution of prokaryotic gene order: genome rearrangements in closely related species.

Authors:  M Suyama; P Bork
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Repeat-associated phase variable genes in the complete genome sequence of Neisseria meningitidis strain MC58.

Authors:  N J Saunders; A C Jeffries; J F Peden; D W Hood; H Tettelin; R Rappuoli; E R Moxon
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Analysis of intrachromosomal duplications in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a possible model for their origin.

Authors:  G Achaz; E Coissac; A Viari; P Netter
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Ongoing evolution of strand composition in bacterial genomes.

Authors:  E P Rocha; A Danchin
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Selfish DNA in protein-coding genes of Rickettsia.

Authors:  H Ogata; S Audic; V Barbe; F Artiguenave; P E Fournier; D Raoult; J M Claverie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  31 in total

1.  Abundant toxin-related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussels.

Authors:  Lizbeth Sayavedra; Manuel Kleiner; Ruby Ponnudurai; Silke Wetzel; Eric Pelletier; Valerie Barbe; Nori Satoh; Eiichi Shoguchi; Dennis Fink; Corinna Breusing; Thorsten Bh Reusch; Philip Rosenstiel; Markus B Schilhabel; Dörte Becher; Thomas Schweder; Stephanie Markert; Nicole Dubilier; Jillian M Petersen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Living with genome instability: the adaptation of phytoplasmas to diverse environments of their insect and plant hosts.

Authors:  Xiaodong Bai; Jianhua Zhang; Adam Ewing; Sally A Miller; Agnes Jancso Radek; Dmitriy V Shevchenko; Kiryl Tsukerman; Theresa Walunas; Alla Lapidus; John W Campbell; Saskia A Hogenhout
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Reductive divergence of enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus sequences among Gammaproteobacteria genomes.

Authors:  Young-Gun Zo
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.422

4.  A method for cloning and sequencing long palindromic DNA junctions.

Authors:  Alison J Rattray
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; Bob Mau; Nicole T Perna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Efficient sampling of parsimonious inversion histories with application to genome rearrangement in Yersinia.

Authors:  István Miklós; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Read length and repeat resolution: exploring prokaryote genomes using next-generation sequencing technologies.

Authors:  Matt J Cahill; Claudio U Köser; Nicholas E Ross; John A C Archer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Extensive rearrangements in the chloroplast genome of Trachelium caeruleum are associated with repeats and tRNA genes.

Authors:  Rosemarie C Haberle; H Matthew Fourcade; Jeffrey L Boore; Robert K Jansen
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 9.  Coevolution of the Organization and Structure of Prokaryotic Genomes.

Authors:  Marie Touchon; Eduardo P C Rocha
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 10.005

10.  CRISPR regulation of intraspecies diversification by limiting IS transposition and intercellular recombination.

Authors:  Takayasu Watanabe; Takashi Nozawa; Chihiro Aikawa; Atsuo Amano; Fumito Maruyama; Ichiro Nakagawa
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.